Just genuinely nasty people

Charles' aggressive, self-justifying bloviation shows that he's secretly ashamed of himself for supporting the evil RepubliQ. I hear that a LOT from conservitards these days. They get even more nasty and defensive when you point out the immorality and hypocrisy of their actions. And of course, then they attack you--as if whatever you do or think has anything to do with their evil!

 

I mean, look at Charles' weak, limp-dicked hyperbole. Maybe possibly someone could have assassinated a Supreme Court judge except it didn't happen and every pro-women's rights protest has been violent and blah blah blah blah blah. You can tell he's ashamed of himself when he resorts to arguments that make him look even more idiotic than usual--a charter member of the insurrection-supporting, democracy-hating, drooling, farting, bigoted, easily conned 75 million.

Charles #1, Charles #2, Jerry and Boiler seem to be trying to thread the needle. I have news for you.  If you willingly get on the bus after hearing the passengers already on the bus chanting "Jews will not replace us" you are just as awful as those people. Maybe even more so because unlike them you know better.

 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Charles' aggressive, self-justifying bloviation shows that he's secretly ashamed of himself for supporting the evil RepubliQ. I hear that a LOT from conservitards these days. They get even more nasty and defensive when you point out the immorality and hypocrisy of their actions. And of course, then they attack you--as if whatever you do or think has anything to do with their evil!

 

I mean, look at Charles' weak, limp-dicked hyperbole. Maybe possibly someone could have assassinated a Supreme Court judge except it didn't happen and every pro-women's rights protest has been violent and blah blah blah blah blah. You can tell he's ashamed of himself when he resorts to arguments that make him look even more idiotic than usual--a charter member of the insurrection-supporting, democracy-hating, drooling, farting, bigoted, easily conned 75 million.


See how upset it gets when you just turn its hasty generalizations and smear campaigns around.  Must have hit a nerve.  I simply showed how we can make an identical argument using their hateful logic against them.  It's a two way street bro.  If all Republicans support violent insurrection, then all Democrats must support fire-bombing Supreme Court justice assassins.  Tell the truth killer.  You wish the assassin had succeeded, right?  All part of the violent, criminal, cop hating, pant shitting, kid grooming 80 million....although it looks like those Biden voters are down to about 60 million now....since we all see the American standard of living quickly eroding because of Democrat leadership.  Thanks Joe!  For nothing.

 

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Boo-yah!  

 

Its a free country, Charles.   You can vote for anyone your precious heart desires.   My point was the majority of Republicans now support the insane, openly-anti-democratic candidates I outlined.  And you are living proof.

 

Thanks for self identifying.   ...and holy shit !


My point was that the vast majority of Americans...Republcan and Democrat don't support violent overthrow or assasinating Justices or Riots or Arson or Firebombing.  But we can certainly spin your candidate's words to make them appear to promote the attempted assasination of a Supreme Court Justice.  'They will reap the whirlwind'.  We can point to the 500 riots in 2020 causing more property damage than any other time in US history and claim that You Supported that.  We can show how your team objected to certifying the 2016 election and how your candidate still claims that election was stolen.  And how all that makes you a hypocrite.  But that would make me an irresponsible political hack ...Like You. Thanks for self identifying!  And thanks for giving me a good laugh.


Originally posted by: Charles

My point was that the vast majority of Americans...Republcan and Democrat don't support violent overthrow or assasinating Justices or Riots or Arson or Firebombing.  But we can certainly spin your candidate's words to make them appear to promote the attempted assasination of a Supreme Court Justice.  'They will reap the whirlwind'.  We can point to the 500 riots in 2020 causing more property damage than any other time in US history and claim that You Supported that.  We can show how your team objected to certifying the 2016 election and how your candidate still claims that election was stolen.  And how all that makes you a hypocrite.  But that would make me an irresponsible political hack ...Like You. Thanks for self identifying!  And thanks for giving me a good laugh.


What stupid asshole Charles is ignoring is that in the case of the insurrection, the gang of RepubliQ politicians has been afforded ample opportunity to show their support or opposition for the insurrection. Almost all of them support and have supported it. And enough time has passed that many of those politicians have gone through election cycles or at least primaries.

 

And almost without fail, the RepubliQ voters have heartily endorsed those insurrectionist candidates.

 

Charles' idiot claim about "riots and property damage" is easily refuted. But I'm not going to give him a historical laundry list of actual riots that caused far more damage and death, such as Tulsa in 1917. But that one happened to black people, so I guess for Charles, that wouldn't count.

 

The difference is that Democrats don't firebomb abortion clinics, then run for office and get elected. Furthermore, there are individual crazies on both sides, and Charles' stupid point is obvious, that they're not representative of the whole. But the insurrectionists were thousands strong, and all the Fox News addicts who stayed home and cheered while they killed people later showed their support by voting for the politicians who endorsed the insurrection.

 

That's the obvious, easy to understand difference between Democratic and RepubliQ extremism. The former is rare and an aberration. The latter is common, mainstream, and part of the party brand.

Once again the resident QOcrat talking head, Kevin Lewis, is spewing lies. I've looked for a person that firebombed an abortion clinic and then got elected to office. There is nothing online that I can find. I'm now of the opinion that you got it from a QOcrat conspiracy rag that you've found.

Why are you still telling the lie that people were killed by the participants on 1/6? I say participants because there were only 2000 insurrectionists that entered the capitol building. Every person that died on or after 1/6, that was there, was of natural, suicide or drug overdose. There were no killings at all.

While the Tulsa destruction of the black business district was a reprehensible act, it doesn't equal the aggregate monetary loss of all the looting incidents occuring after BLM peaceful protests. That's what Charles referenced. The people involved, in the breaking and entering to loot, were there for the sole purpose of getting free stuff. You show how little you understand of the destruction caused by the looters.Your equating Tulsa 1917 to looting diminishes the gravity of that day. Comparing looting to the death and destruction that was rained down on the black community of Tulsa in 1917 is about as classless as it gets. Maybe your cavalier attitude towards Tulsa 1917 is because you really are a racist Kevin. After all, you are the only person using the "N" word on this forum. You use it as much as possible. You're also the first person to use interracial sex and/or marriage as an insult to white men.

Originally posted by: Charles

My point was that the vast majority of Americans...Republcan and Democrat don't support violent overthrow or assasinating Justices or Riots or Arson or Firebombing.  But we can certainly spin your candidate's words to make them appear to promote the attempted assasination of a Supreme Court Justice.  'They will reap the whirlwind'.  We can point to the 500 riots in 2020 causing more property damage than any other time in US history and claim that You Supported that.  We can show how your team objected to certifying the 2016 election and how your candidate still claims that election was stolen.  And how all that makes you a hypocrite.  But that would make me an irresponsible political hack ...Like You. Thanks for self identifying!  And thanks for giving me a good laugh.


I know - insurrection is hilarious aint it?

 

Its not spin when the candidate who wins a primary was one of the terrorists on the Capital steps.   And there is no Democrat equivalent of that as much as you desperately want there to be.

 

5 years ago you could have said Bernie Sanders and Liz Cheney represented the fringes of the parties.  Thats still true for Democrats.  Liz Cheney is now a RHINO because refuses to jump off the cliff with Benedict Arnold and the rest of the Republican party.    And you seem to be right thre with them....and having yourself a good laugh.  Good for you.   And I dont care.   

 

Just hear to point out the facts.

 

 

Originally posted by: PackerBackerAZ

Once again the resident QOcrat talking head, Kevin Lewis, is spewing lies. I've looked for a person that firebombed an abortion clinic and then got elected to office. There is nothing online that I can find. I'm now of the opinion that you got it from a QOcrat conspiracy rag that you've found.

Why are you still telling the lie that people were killed by the participants on 1/6? I say participants because there were only 2000 insurrectionists that entered the capitol building. Every person that died on or after 1/6, that was there, was of natural, suicide or drug overdose. There were no killings at all.

While the Tulsa destruction of the black business district was a reprehensible act, it doesn't equal the aggregate monetary loss of all the looting incidents occuring after BLM peaceful protests. That's what Charles referenced. The people involved, in the breaking and entering to loot, were there for the sole purpose of getting free stuff. You show how little you understand of the destruction caused by the looters.Your equating Tulsa 1917 to looting diminishes the gravity of that day. Comparing looting to the death and destruction that was rained down on the black community of Tulsa in 1917 is about as classless as it gets. Maybe your cavalier attitude towards Tulsa 1917 is because you really are a racist Kevin. After all, you are the only person using the "N" word on this forum. You use it as much as possible. You're also the first person to use interracial sex and/or marriage as an insult to white men.


You are what you are--sadly--and I'm not going to argue against that.

 

The BLM protests were 99% peaceful. Their intent was peaceful. And that intent and action were completely lawful. Yeah, some Proud Boys got in there and started fights and set fires in dumpsters. What of it? How can you, with any kind of moral or intellectual honesty, compare that the the murderous insurrection or the murderous 1917 Tulsa riots? Answer: you can't. Your stupid false equivalence argument is a tired conservitard weasel-trope. And Packer, you stupid fuck, I didn't equate Tulsa and the BLM protests--I said that Tulsa was much, much worse. You can't even read, you bigoted idiot.

 

You can be "of" any opinion you like (again, sadly). But you're not entitled to your own facts. That aside, though, saying that the trivial property damage during the BLM protests--NOT "riots"--was worse than the mass slaughter that happened in Tulsa, or the horrific acts of violence and murder that occurred on Trump Insurrection Day is...I dunno. Disgusting? Asinine? Ridiculous?

 

Factor in that there were no murders during the BLM protests except those committed by white boys who infiltrated the protests, and...oh, I give up. I keep trying to argue against bigotry and racism, as if it were possible to address them with logic and facts.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

What stupid asshole Charles is ignoring is that in the case of the insurrection, the gang of RepubliQ politicians has been afforded ample opportunity to show their support or opposition for the insurrection. Almost all of them support and have supported it. And enough time has passed that many of those politicians have gone through election cycles or at least primaries.

 

And almost without fail, the RepubliQ voters have heartily endorsed those insurrectionist candidates.

 

Charles' idiot claim about "riots and property damage" is easily refuted. But I'm not going to give him a historical laundry list of actual riots that caused far more damage and death, such as Tulsa in 1917. But that one happened to black people, so I guess for Charles, that wouldn't count.

 

The difference is that Democrats don't firebomb abortion clinics, then run for office and get elected. Furthermore, there are individual crazies on both sides, and Charles' stupid point is obvious, that they're not representative of the whole. But the insurrectionists were thousands strong, and all the Fox News addicts who stayed home and cheered while they killed people later showed their support by voting for the politicians who endorsed the insurrection.

 

That's the obvious, easy to understand difference between Democratic and RepubliQ extremism. The former is rare and an aberration. The latter is common, mainstream, and part of the party brand.


What the idiot groomer Kevin lacks in actual facts he makes up in pure stupidity.

 

He claims 'Democrats don't firebomb abortion clinics'.  No.  They firebomb Pro-Life Christian Centers....after being frenzied up by their political leadership.

 

New York pro-life Christian center firebombed as Supreme Court considers Rie v Wade | Daily Mail Online

Where's the outrage Democrats? There is none.

 

Now after democrat leadership incitement, they try to assassinate a Supreme Court Justice.  Chuckie Schumer threatened them by name 2 years ago.  Now, they Doxed his home address, and Joe Biden encouraged the illegal protests in front of his house.  Of course some deranged leftist was bound to try to take him out.  I'm surprised it wasn't Kevin.  Even though the Senate voted unanimously to beef up security for Supreme Court Justices and their family,  Nancy Pelosi sits on the bill for 2 months.  Why is that?  What's the Democrat agenda?  Violence.  Death.  Destruction.  Kill a Justice if they don't agree with you?  Where are the investigations...the outrage?  Why it's a direct attack on American democracy and justice.

 

As for the Democrat riots of 2020, Kevin again has his head up his rectum.  He claims "riots and property damage' is easily refuted.  Refute this:  "However, arson, vandalism, and looting that occurred between May 26 and June 8 caused approximately $1–2 billion in damages nationally, the highest recorded damage from civil disorder in U.S. history, and surpassing the record set during the 1992 Los Angeles riots."

 

George Floyd protests - Wikipedia

 

 

Yet still, I'm really only arguing these points to expose his/her/it's foolish Democrat smear campaign.  It's all they've got.  I understand that not all democrats are rioters and assassins.  My reasonable Democrat friends will tell me they think I'm wrong about something and try to make a case and we often come to agreement on things.  Not extremist propagandists like Kevin and PJ though.  Now all they do is call millions of Republicans Insurrectionist, Nazi, Racists.  It's all they've got.

 

Well fuck you.  Stalinist, groomer, white soy boy.  You’re the racist idiot liar.  I’m just not going to let you get away with it this time.  Says a proud Hispanic Republican.. You want to continue to suck Biden's cock even though he's failed this country in virtually every foreign and domestic outcome....fine.  I'll debate you on any real topic.  You just want to continue your smear campaign of all Republicans?  You'll get more of the same and I'll continue to out your hypocricy and stupidity.  You're the genuinely nasty person here.  I'm just setting the record straight.

Charles.....this is all Kevin and these guys got.  This forum.  Their base is about 50M now and falling quickly.  Wait til November and going forward and get ready for all the crying in this forum.  

 

PJ - never did answer if he would vote for Joe again?  Must be ashamed of something.  

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now