PJ, that's exactly the lie. At nameplate of 3.8GW, it the farms power 3.3 million pounds. THE FUCKING FARMS DO NOT RUN AT NAMEPLATE, BUT INSTEAD AT 1/3 OF NAMEPLATE.
In reality, the farm powers 1.1 million homes. Plus there is zero discussion of the back up power plant. Lyin' Libs are really stupid people and unwilling to check for the truth.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Neither did you beyond you saying so. And we know what that means dont we? Here's the 2022 data....
Grimsby windfarm now fully operational (not 30% like Boilerman lied about)
"our total capacity from Grimsby is 3.8GW, providing enough electricity to power 3.3 million homes. And it does not just stop there, by 2030, we will be on track to power over a quarter of UK households."
Or as Boilerman will paraphrase that to..."Wind power dont work cause the wind dont always blow"
Look at page 7 of the last link that I posted. It addresses production rates as a percentage of nameplate during the first 7 years................running at 35% for both wind farms addressed in the 60 minutes piece. It also shows last months production as a percentage of nameplate, running at 36%. It also lists standard diviation, which will spin Kevins 3rd grade mind.
Are you really too lazy to do even a minutes worth of research? I've known this shit for 15 years.
Sorry, the farms addressed on 60 Minutes are listed on page 8 of my last past. PJ, fucking do a little bit of work, for god's sake.
Sorry, the farms addressed on 60 Minutes are listed on page 8 of this post, WHICH IS THE SAME POST FROM ABOVE. PJ, fucking do a little bit of research, for god's sake.
file:///C:/Users/daleo/Downloads/ALDERSEY-WILLIAMS%202020%20Analysis%20of%20United%20Kingdom.pdf
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Look at page 7 of the last link that I posted. It addresses production rates as a percentage of nameplate during the first 7 years................running at 35% for both wind farms addressed in the 60 minutes piece. It also shows last months production as a percentage of nameplate, running at 36%. It also lists standard diviation, which will spin Kevins 3rd grade mind.
Are you really too lazy to do even a minutes worth of research? I've known this shit for 15 years.
"The first seven years" Who gives a shit?
You keep posting worthless information 10 years ago. The farm wasnt at full capacity while it was still under construction? And Thats a huge scandal according to you? I cant help you with that. ALl I can tell you is its old information that your tried to sell as current. And thats just dishonest. WHat a lyin lib you ca be sometime.
And since you did some "fucking research" how come you cant show it? Where's the back up generator statisitcs..or did a friend tell you? And I got news for you...backup power plants are part of the fossill fuel world too. I did some "fucking research" and learned that too !
Have a fucking good time in Vegas
Thanks for pointing that out. It actually shows the data from when for farms opened in 2008 through 2020. It also show the two wind farms efficiency as a percentage of nameplate the last month before the report came out in 2020............37%.
Look up what 37% of nameplace is. Look up what the average UK household uses in electricity. From there it's an easy calculation to figure out how many homes that powers. Compare that to what 60 Minutes reported and they are off by 200%.
Thanks for pointing that out. It actually shows the data from when for farms opened in 2008 through 2020. It also show the two wind farms efficiency as a percentage of nameplate the last month before the report came out in 2020............37%.
Look up what 37% of nameplace is. Look up what the average UK household uses in electricity. From there it's an easy calculation to figure out how many homes that powers. Compare that to what 60 Minutes reported and they are off by 200%.
Never trust a Lyin' Lib.
Within the past year or so, I read an article about a NE United States offshore wind farm. Not only did this article not address the back up plant cost, not only did it use nameplate capacity to figure homes powered, it lied about powder used by an averagehome in the NE by a factor of 3.5. This writer lied an a scale of 1000%.
Boiler appears to be genuinely too stupid to understand that wind power is never intended to be the sole source of a community's electricity.
Boilerman has a long history of doing two things....
(A) posting articles that dont say what he says they say
(B) referencing articles he somehow cant link to.
This thread is a great example.
