Most Americans want Roe v Wade to stay established law.

No, you explained what the Supreme Court said, which frankly made no sense.

No, you explained what the Supreme Court said about why this issue should be handled at the federal level, which frankly made no sense.

I cringe at how most Liberals on any topic believe that "important issues" should all be mandated at the federal level, regardless of the Constitution mandating that some of these "important issues" only be handled at the state level.  In other words, screw the Constitution.

Again - the Constituion was cited in Roe....and its pretty obvious.  The fact that you cant "make sense of it" is not anything I can help you with.    

Republicans like Boileman spend their lives complaining about government intervening in their lives and how they cherish individual freedom.  But suddenly they cant make any sense of that concept when it comes to this issue.    And they pretend like the Constitution doesn't address it.

I dont believe they cant make sense of it.  I believe they cant make sense of their hypocrisy.

I've read the Supreme Court's Roe v Wade stance, and there was nothing within their argument that logically lead to handling  this at the federal level.  Zero.

I'm asking PJ to point out their most important point.  He can't because it's all bullshit.

Again - I already did.    Twice now.    Boilerman not understanding multiple Supreme Courts composed of both liberals and conservatives rulings about freedom and privacy doesn't make them less true or the Constitional Ammendment they are based on less real.

maybe their is a pop-up story book somewhere Boilerman can purchase that can help his understanding.   Tutoring partisan conservatives about history, government, and precedent is above my pay grade.

No, you regirgitated their words.  What is the most important paragraph that they wrote to support their opinion that abortion should be handled at the federal level.

You won't and you refuese to, because their argument is so weak.

I don't find any Constitutional argument that abortion shouldn't allowed at the state level.

Kevin's argument is that this issue is supper important, thus should automatically be handled at the fed level, and that argument holds no water.

Could a state outlaw all marriage in your view?

I doubt it.  If you are getting at same sex marriage or interracial marriage, I believe that this should be mandated at the federal leval as the Constitution addresses marriage.  I believe that all such marraiges should be allowed.

But the constitution doesn't mention any right to marriage.  

I was incorrect on my previous statement.  I thought that the Constitution guaranteed to right to marriage and it does not.  This means that it must be handled on a state by state basis.  While I have zero problem with gay marraige, it's a state issue.

For those who don't like this, the procedure is a Constitutional Amendment.  Yes, it's difficult and for good reason.