Most Conservatives Hate The Truth And They Hate Democracy What About You?

Originally posted by: tom

We tried amnesty in the 80's. The promise was no more illegals. Now we are back. If we grant amnesty now, it will just reset the clock & we will be back again. 

You don't have to deport illegals, just make it more difficult to live here. Prove legal residency before attending schools, getting social services. Enforce hiring laws.   Commit a crime you get deported. No sanctuary cities. Allow ICE into the court house & jails to deport criminals. 


No one's talking about amnesty, and it hasn't ever been tried, in the 80s or any other time.

 

I really can't fathom why the presence of some guy picking lettuce for $8.50 an hour twists your panties so much. How do you think the presence of illegal immigrants harms you so very, very, very much, Tommie-poo?

 

As to your asinine recommendations, they're impractical at best and profoundly stupid at worst. I'd explain to you why, but you wouldn't understand and you're not worth the effort.

The relevant kernel of information in this story is the fact that most of the illegal immigrants whose presence sends Tommie-poo and his ilk into such a frenzied lather arrived here legally. The conservitard, Trumpian, RepubliQ, Mother Tucker imagery of bloodthirsty brown-skinned hordes flooding across the border, waving sombreros and screaming "Aye Caramba!!!" is utter bullshit. I refuse to get worked up about some guy who works in a restaurant and doesn't have the proper documentation. How does that hurt me? In fact, it's probably why the lunch special is still only $7.95.

 

It is definitely part of being an American to get pulled over for no reason other than that the cop hasn't gotten laid in a month or his hemorrhoids are acting up (did I spell that right? lol). The guy didn't understand that you should just cooperate, smile nicely, lick the cop's shoes, take the damn ticket, and resolve to fight it later in court. It's a royal pain in the ass but the good news is, half the time you win (if for no other reason than the cop doesn't show up), and most of the remaining time, you can at least finagle a lessened charge and/or reduced fine.

 

I suppose that someone from a country like China might not think that appearing in court is anything but a completely futile exercise, and in fact, where he comes from, disputing a criminal charge is frowned upon, considered socially deviant, and might land you in a labor camp. But here in AMURRIKA, we reserve the labor camps for the children of Hispanic migrants. So, not to worry.

 

I don't want the cops to deprive me of my Kung Pao Chicken with Hot and Sour soup, tea, and rice. Oh, and eggroll.

 

 

Edited on May 21, 2021 2:40pm

Tom has a big problem with the immigrants who clean hotel rooms at Mara-Lago...but he votes for their employer for president....twice.

 

And so did the cable pundits Tom gets his propoganda from.

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Tom has a big problem with the immigrants who clean hotel rooms at Mara-Lago...but he votes for their employer for president....twice.

 

And so did the cable pundits Tom gets his propoganda from.


Well, poor Tommie-poo hasn't had a thought that originated inside his own head for some time now. To put it another way, he doesn't think; he's fed.

 

In that, he is a model Republican.


No one's talking about amnesty, and it hasn't ever been tried, in the 80s or any other time.

 

Once again pj is wrong

 

On Nov. 6, 1986 Ronald Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, the most far-reaching immigration law passed during his presidency. The Act’s most significant effect was that it allowed immigrants who had entered the U.S. illegally before Jan. 1, 1982 to apply for legal status, provided they paid fines and back taxes. This provision — which Reagan himself referred to as “amnesty,” allowed around 3 million immigrants to secure legal status after paying $185, demonstrating “good moral character” and learning to speak English

 

Once again liberals show that they are in favor of breaking the law

Tom makes the point of "liberals in favor of breaking the law" in the context of citing a law signed by Ronald Reagan.     Thanks for that bit of hilarity.

 

We've officially got a new member of the Deep State.

Just because Reagan referred to the process incorrectly doesn't mean it actually was "amnesty." Reagan said a LOT of nonsensical things. As do you.

 

Tommie-poo refers to something that happened 35 years ago as "once again" and apparently thinks that Reagan was a liberal.

 

Dementia is a terrible thing.

Edited on May 24, 2021 8:07am

It is the liberals who favor breaking the law signed by President Reagan. 

When people who break the law get let off the hook, it is amnesty. 

If people want to come here to work there is a legal process to go thru. 

The BP has apprehended people from over 100 countries, many of them coming from Asia. In addition, significant amount of drugs, members of MS 13 & people on the tertiorist watch list. So much for the liberal myth of poor Hispanics. 

Edited on May 24, 2021 8:21am
Originally posted by: tom

It is the liberals who favor breaking the law signed by President Reagan. 

When people who break the law get let off the hook, it is amnesty. 

If people want to come here to work there is a legal process to go thru. 

The BP has apprehended people from over 100 countries, many of them coming from Asia. In addition, significant amount of drugs, members of MS 13 & people on the tertiorist watch list. So much for the liberal myth of poor Hispanics. 


No doubt...and you know what didnt stop them?  The conservative brain trust idea of building a wall.

 

So again - you can embrace a comprehensive immigration bill that addresses all of the issues with our broken immigration system....or you can rile up retards in white sheets by telling them we just need a wall.  Clearly we know the strategy Tom prefers.  He's in the right party.

 

 

The wall cannot be successful, when it is not complete.  That detail has been told to you before.

 

The so called "comprehensive" bill is merely an amnesty bill.  

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now