Oakland Unbelievably Lost All Three of Its Pro Sports Teams In Just 5 Years

Yeah, the Warriors "fled" to a location eight miles away.

The reason why the Raiders, A's, and Warriors left Oakland was the very poor condition of the Oakland Coliseum. The Warriors didn't have competition for the local fan base, so they stayed in the Bay Area. The A's and Raiders were competing with very successful franchises already in the Bay Area, and Oakland didn't want to finance a new stadium, so they left.

What our resident conservitard morons don't acknowledge is that "liberal cities" are and always have been excellent venues for successful sports franchises. That's because people in liberal cities have money, and there's less risk of a gun love goober shooting up the place.

The Warriors chose to move to "liberal San Francisco." How do our conservitards explain that?

Oakland today  -- https://www.facebook.com/reel/552371633438272

 Just another future DemocRat voter  -- https://www.facebook.com/reel/618085306842169

David gets owned in a thread he started so he changes the subject. 

That's how he rolls...

People are leaving Portland and sports teams are leaving California, and Kevin tells you that it's a good thing.  How funny.

Show us where Kevin said that, Cliff, or it's just another of your many, many lies you've told here.

Let me guess:  you know a "guy" who lived in Portland in a "big" house and makes "lots" of money and he moved out of Portland because . . . (some reason that agrees with your predilection). 

You can be so smart when you have a small army of imaginary friends, all of whom are "experts"!

Boiler hasn't told us how he knows why people have left the city of Portland or where they went. He says they've all gone to the "conservative" suburbs--you know, the ones that have voted 70% Democratic.

Portland BTW has a vacancy rate under 1%.