Has Gym Jordan or J.D. Vance visited?
And why isn't there stricter rules on trains carring toxins?
Answer? https://www.levernews.com/rail-companies-blocked-safety-rules-before-ohio-derailment/
Has Gym Jordan or J.D. Vance visited?
And why isn't there stricter rules on trains carring toxins?
Answer? https://www.levernews.com/rail-companies-blocked-safety-rules-before-ohio-derailment/
The risk of oil spills on rail shipments is far greater than the risk of pipeline oil transport. Why do Liberals continue to prevent more pipelines, forcing oil companies to transport crude via the far more risky rail car method?
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The risk of oil spills on rail shipments is far greater than the risk of pipeline oil transport. Why do Liberals continue to prevent more pipelines, forcing oil companies to transport crude via the far more risky rail car method?
They do this deliberately, knowing full well that the increased chance for this type of occurance will give them more opportunities to bemoan fossil fuels. They play every angle and brainwash the ignorant morans who are too stupid to see thru the "green new deal" bullshit
Oil was not being transported on the derailed train.
But it is deja-BP-Oil-spill all over again.
According to FOX News, Pete Buttigieg was driving the train and made it derail. Its all his fault - not the railroad.
And its also a reminder of the need for better infrastructure including upgraded rail lines that people on the right say is a big waste of money. Those shovels get into the ground this spring. And you can bet JD Vance will be at the ribbon cutting ceremony
Originally posted by: Boilerman
The risk of oil spills on rail shipments is far greater than the risk of pipeline oil transport. Why do Liberals continue to prevent more pipelines, forcing oil companies to transport crude via the far more risky rail car method?
Because pipelines cost huge sums of money, including for maintenance after they start operating, block other uses of the land they're on (roads, housing, etc.), and are by no means immune from spills and leakage--and an oil pipeline spill is far, far worse than a rail car spill--in the latter case, the amount of oil spilled is finite, and much smaller.
You would have thought that Boiler would have learned about choo-choos during his four years in kindergarten.
Boil's Purdue degree didn't teach him to stay on topic.
I never said that there was crude on this train, and PJ knows it.
I asked why do Liberals force more oil rail transport, and PJ also knows that this is what I asked. He clumsily dodged the question.
I'll let the intelligent reader decide who is being honest.
My reply was on topic for the thread. Yours was not. But thanks for stopping by
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
My reply was on topic for the thread. Yours was not. But thanks for stopping by
Okay PJ, cut and paste expamples of posts that I made that support your comments. You won't because you've got nothing.
???
I didn't say anything about you in any of my comments. Can you cut and paste where I mentioned your name anywhere on this thread? I thought I would add a comment about the subject. You have three posts on this thread - none of which pertain to the subject. Free country, though.