Poland's offer on MiG fighter jets

Originally posted by: Mark

The reality is Trump was giving Putin what he wanted so there was no need to invade. He wanted to dissolve NATO and according to John Bolton if Trump had won a second term he would have dissolved NATO. That is what Putin wanted. Don't forget Trump blackmailed Ukraine and was enraged that they didn't take it. 

 

If Putin would have called Trump and said I am going to invade Ukraine Trump would have been thrilled.  He was in fact thrilled when he did invade given his glowing praise about Putin being a genius. He would have probably tried to get a Black Sea Trump tower deal though.


   One of the most asinine assumptions I have ever read. John Bolton?? Blackmailed Ukraine?? - You are so out of touch with reality -you really are ignorant.

Trump will always have his boot-lickers. I mean, if things like Davey Dear LUVVVV and worship a traitor, con man, thief, and rapist, there's not much he could do to lose their loyalty, is there?

 

Well, I guess he could lose support by doing or saying something good or sensible. But, zero chance of that.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Trump will always have his boot-lickers. I mean, if things like Davey Dear LUVVVV and worship a traitor, con man, thief, and rapist, there's not much he could do to lose their loyalty, is there?

 

Well, I guess he could lose support by doing or saying something good or sensible. But, zero chance of that.


 Lewis, would you care to post something truthful instead of your lying truth twisting rhetoric? 

Originally posted by: David Miller

   One of the most asinine assumptions I have ever read. John Bolton?? Blackmailed Ukraine?? - You are so out of touch with reality -you really are ignorant.


Our resident Libs really need to broaden their news base.  He'll, they're still telling us that Trump colluded with Russia and that the government wasn't spying on Trump.  Why do they still believe these things?  Because their only sources of news ignore this stuff.


Trump's collusion with Russia and bromance with Putin are so well documented, only a Trump-licking conservitard would dispute it.

 

Not that there's any shortage of such creatures, even now. I salute David Miller and Boiler for their undying loyalty for and love of Vladimir Putin, that shirtless manly man and Trump-bro whom they adore. "Very strong."

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Our resident Libs really need to broaden their news base.  He'll, they're still telling us that Trump colluded with Russia and that the government wasn't spying on Trump.  Why do they still believe these things?  Because their only sources of news ignore this stuff.


Should we listen to the pundits on FOX who are cheering Putin and Jeering Ukraine?    

 

Oh - and your second sentence is true as has been repeteadly fact checked on this board multiple times...and then countered with nothing.    But thanks for stopping by !

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Should we listen to the pundits on FOX who are cheering Putin and Jeering Ukraine?    

 

Oh - and your second sentence is true as has been repeteadly fact checked on this board multiple times...and then countered with nothing.    But thanks for stopping by !


       Post videos of what you say Fox is doing - if you don't, then shut up and quit lying.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Trump's collusion with Russia and bromance with Putin are so well documented, only a Trump-licking conservitard would dispute it.

 

Not that there's any shortage of such creatures, even now. I salute David Miller and Boiler for their undying loyalty for and love of Vladimir Putin, that shirtless manly man and Trump-bro whom they adore. "Very strong."


Oh God, here we go.

Stats tell us that's it's a 1/8 likelihood that these events happened under Obama/Biden......all things being equal.  The Libs appear certain that this is a coincidence.

Edited on Mar 9, 2022 2:50pm
Originally posted by: Boilerman

Stats tell us that's it's a 1/8 likelihood that these events happened under Obama/Biden......all things being equal.  The Libs appear certain that this is a coincidence.


Boiler, now you're not even making sense. "A 1/8 likelihood" of a past event? Either it did happen or it didn't.

 

There are no "Libs." There are liberals. I've tried to educate you on that.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now