Sanctuary cities and states refuse of offer sanctuary.

Yes, and its not a secret or a scandal or a political stunt.  Its the immigration office settling immigrants like they are suppossed to.       And your own article says as much.   And this is the difference between letting the immigration officials resettle these people vs letting mouthbreathing Klan disciples do it.    Thanks for the opportunity to show the contrast in compassion and betterment of society.

Office of immigration resettlement

"Many refugees have family or close friends already in the United States, and resettlement agencies make every effort to reunite them.  Others are placed where they have the best opportunity for success through employment with the assistance of strong community services.  Agencies place refugees through a network of approximately 200 local affiliates operating in communities throughout the United States.  Through its local affiliates, each agency monitors the resources that each community offers (e.g., availability of affordable and safe housing, school capacity, medical care, and employment opportunities)."

Addressing you're quote.  Never trust a Lyin' Liberal.  Where has been this assistance for Texas and Arizona?  Texas, by the way, spends $4 billion annually on their illegals problem, and they know that it's a financial loser for them for these illegals to remain in the state................but New York and PJ know better, somehow.

The illegals in NY are secretly flown into the Westchester County airport after it is closed. 

You post a vague policy statement but there are no numbers. How many illegals come into this country where they already have relatives?  

Whats the big secret?    Was this some kind of clandestine mission that the NY Post uncovered from Trump's Top-Secret documents in Mara-Lago. Is the office of immgration placement some secret division of the X-Files?

Your own article says the immigrants where united with RELATIVES per the policy I just outlined which is the best way to acclimate them to our country and get them working.  And not that you give a shit - but its also the most humane.     

Its in the article Tom just posted.   What else can I help with today?

And since you hide under a rock any time I offer you the opportunity to boycott employers who hire immigrants its clear you understand their value to society.  But you're just constipated anyway.   Thanks for stopping by.

 Just because one has "relatives" is not a legal excuse to break American laws and enter the United States illegally. You keep alluding to the made up "fact" that these illegals should be allowed to break U.S. laws and enter and stay in the U.S. because America needs workers - all you are doing is advocating for the continual import of foreigners for their "cheap" labor - this is no different than what was done when Negroes were brought to America and became slaves to work the plantations. Also, many of these illegals have no intent to work but are only here to exploit  America's benevolance, welfare, food stamps, medical services, housing - all at American tax payer expense. And this does not address the fact that many of these illegals are here solely with the intent to continue their criminal lives, importing illegal drugs, selling drugs, robbing, raping, and the many other crimes they commit. A huge percentage of these illegals are not being properly vetted and are turned loose to continue their criminal activities. The southern border is unsecure, with millions of illegals entering America and are being allowed to do whatever they want- without recourse. And this does not take into account  the many thousands who cross the border undetected - and you can rest assured that these undetected illegals are the worst of the criminals who enter. 

Cut-and-paste the law the assylum seekers  are breaking.     I'll wait.    And if you cant find it can we all just agree you're a whiny little bigot with a small dick?

  You cut and paste the laws that they are abiding by. I'll wait. And if you can'f find we all will agree that you are a liar - again.

@PJ..Just out of curiosity, share your personal estimate regarding the %/ proportion of these asylum seekers that will actually appear for their mandated court hearings to complete their asylum processes. Nobody knows, but..what's your guess? And please...share your empathetic and compassionate insight as to the efficiency of these current asylum processes, and just whom is paying the bill for it all. Then, if you haven't yet exhausted your fuel supply, you can make another verbal ( yet hopeless) attempt to convince me that this current administration's immigration attitudes / policies are not political and subsequently not designed to ultimately garner future Democratic votes.

Thanks.

I'm quite sure I dont know.   And your line of questioning presumes a strawman argument that I believe we dont have a broken immigration system.   We most certainly do.

You know what doesnt fix it?   Bussing immigrants in an uncorridanted fashion to a random location where there are no resources to assist them.    Do you support that, Charles?  Is that your solution to fixing our broken immigration system?   Because that doesnt seem like something constructive unless your definiton of constructive is scoring points with Sean Hannity,.  Those are women and children being dumped on the sidewalk.   Is the treatment of human being like that something people like you care about?   I'm curious.

There is an entire comprehensive list of reforms that need to be made that sensible people largely agree on - including Republicans like George Bush.     It ranges from increased border security to handling people who have already been here for years.     

One thing is for sure - Baby boomers are retiring and Millenials arent making babies.   People who believe our economy will survive without massive amounts of immigrants should see how that worked out for Japan over the last 30 years.