Sanctuary cities and states refuse of offer sanctuary.

An inept and cowardly little dodge, Davey Dog. You accuse these people of being "illegals"--then when challenged to tell us what laws they're breaking, you slink away with your tail between your legs. Then, of course, you revert to your scummy little habit of calling every else a liar.

You're a liar, and a coward.

Gee, they're "secretly" flown into Westchester County--yet, somehow, stupid Tommie-poo knows all about it! GAWRSH!!!

And stupid Tommie-poo can mislabel them over and over, but they're not "illegals" if US immigration authorities are handling them this way.

Stupid, bigoted, ugly, racist Tommie-poo.

@PJ...Regarding your curiosity regarding my empathy for bussed migrants, I personally wouldn't have allowed the process to approach that decision point or those locations. I'd certainly focus on the "increased border security" aspect you mentioned pertaining to the influx of migrants at the border. More efficient use of immigration funds might be funneled into extensive asylum detention facilities with a highly expedited  processing protocol ( enforce a much speedier process) for judges to hear and process the cases. That has long been a huge problem, that backlog of unprocessed cases regardless of partisanship. If we look at the history of the asylum application success rates, about 37% of asylum seekers were granted successful entry in FY 2021. I don't know what the current stats are, but I'd guess they're much higher than that currently.  If you're really interested in the source link regarding that stat, I can dig it up ( maybe next week, if not later ; you can find it, I'm sure..if interested *l*).

Conservative SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito offered his dissent ( from the losing side) on the very recent SCOTUS decision regarding Biden vs Texas which was just recently decided. I'd never expect you to agree with his points / arguments in that dissent..but I absolutely do ( which you might expect since you know which camp I'm in, generally speaking). But, if you want some "enemy-side opinion" pieces, here's a link to that source. It might be a lot more informative than watching Hannity for building your future argument arsenal.

https://www.law/cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/21-954#writing-21-954_DISSENT_6

Vote.

@Charles.  I dont understand your post.   And you dodged my question so I will politely ask it again..  Given the currrent environment -  do you approve of the bussing and dropping off assylum seekers to random areas without any resources for them?   A simple yes or no is all that is required.

   And your plan to "not have allowed it to happen" is kind of toothless isn't it?    Is your undestanding of US law the UNited States president can unilarterally create laws or funding to address immigration issues?   If so you took a very different Federal civics class than I did.

It requires 60 votes in the US Senate to resolve this issue comprehensively.   I dont know of a single Democrat who opposses moving forward to that solution.  That just leaves the other people who to date have never offered up anything beyond building a wall.    And last time I checked walls dont stop people from seeking assylum.    

      PJ, still waiting for your response - apparently you don't have one to back up your assertion. Typical of you - all noise, with nothing to back up the noise.

PJ, 7000 illegals are crossing the border daily.  How many has Biden moved to sanctuary states?

I dont know what "illegals" you are talking about...or what a "sanctuary state" is.   

I do know the Biden administration is processing the legal assylum seekrs in accordance to US laws with the resources we have.    And that doesnt involve being an asshole and bussing kids to random sidewalks in random cities without coordinating for their care.     Being an asshole is the Repiblican soluition to addressing people looking to come to America to make a better life.      And thats ok.  Being an asshole isnt illegal.  its just not something I make an effort to subscrube to    

I asked first, shortbus.   Go scroll through facebook and see if you can find a mouth breathing inbreeder to get the answer.

 As expected, PJ has nothing to back up his lie - or he would post it in order to prove me wrong. Typical lying liberal - all mouth with no factual response. It is so easy to expose these liars, they never have facts to back up their lies.

@PJ...I didn't dodge your question, Captain..are you just attempting to stir my porridge? I offered an alternative approach to placing them on a bus in the first place. I don't approve of adding any type of suffering to those folks lives; I'm assuming they all must have signed some sort of agreement regardless of their transport type or destination. In summation, I don't think the current immigration / asylum laws in place and enacted by Congress are being adhered to...period. Hell no to the Executive branch being able to unilaterally create orders / laws and/or funding regarding immigration...that's completely and totally under Congressional purview. And the  procedural process itself is in shambles. Further, I think you might be a bit misled regarding the current administration's often-voiced reputation of effusive compassion and humanitarian concern for these migrants..I think they have other more prioritous political intent myself.   And I still have all my natural teeth, though they're shorter than they used to be...so I don't consider myself toothless ( a tad silly, though..occasionally).

Might be back in a week or so..or not.*l*. Carry on.