Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
I largely agree with seperating sports genders. And while I fully support people to identify with whatever gender they wish and receive the full respect that is due there - there are some biological facts that are ..well...facts.
Testosterone is essentially a performance enhancing drug. People who have lots of it in their system have more muscle and bone mass than those with lesser amount. Thats a fact. Thats what testosterone does.
So if you put Lebron James on the women's basketball team because he decides to identify as a woman he is going to beat the shit out of everyone in the league. Because in addtion to awesome skills - he also has a more height / muscle mass / bone mass.
Obviously--but he would beat the shit out of almost everyone in the men's league as well.
My point, which seems to have rocketed over everyone's head, is that there are SOME women--however large or small that number may be--who have the physical ability to compete in men's professional sports. I don't see why sports leagues shouldn't allow them to at least try.
As for the "there are no female professional athletes in men's leagues" argument--well, why would there be, if the rules forbid them to compete in the first place? I think that absence is far more due to those prohibitions than that ALL women are physically incapable.
There are hundreds of male professional athletes who are smaller, shorter, weaker, slower, etc. than the most capable women. Maybe the overlap is small, but, once again, why not let them try out?
(Short answer: sexism, in one of the most completely male-dominated industries in America.)