The Midnight Shelter in LA has 1.200 voters but only 120 beds. The St Joseph's Shelter has no beds but 185 voters. The same shelter received $600k from
Ramens office.
And the investigations are just starting
You can't have votes come in a week after Election Day, and also allow ballots without postmarks.
Originally posted by: tom
The Midnight Shelter in LA has 1.200 voters but only 120 beds. The St Joseph's Shelter has no beds but 185 voters. The same shelter received $600k from
Ramens office.
And the investigations are just starting
You can't have votes come in a week after Election Day, and also allow ballots without postmarks.
Yeah, homeless people are worthless scum who shouldn't be allowed to vote.
The number of people who want beds always greatly exceeds the number of beds available
Stupid, bigoted asshole Tom.
The sole criterion for whether a ballot should be "allowed" is whether it bears the signature of a registered voter. It won't have a postmark on it unless it was submitted via the US Mail.
If a homeless person is a registered voter, then they are entitled to vote, and their ballot will be validated by comparing its signature with the signature on file.
Therefore, stupid Tom, a homeless person, like any other citizen, cannot cast a valid vote unless they are registered, and if they do cast a ballot without being registered, that ballot will be invalidated and ultimately discarded.
Therefore, what stupid Tom and asshole Miller are bleating about is a ridiculous MAGA fantasy.
Stupid, bigoted asshole Tom.
Originally posted by: tom
The Midnight Shelter in LA has 1.200 voters but only 120 beds. The St Joseph's Shelter has no beds but 185 voters. The same shelter received $600k from
Ramens office.
And the investigations are just starting
You can't have votes come in a week after Election Day, and also allow ballots without postmarks.
I've haven't done any research, no point, when I nail you with facts you dissappear. It's a MAGA trait clearly displayed in this forum. I have an idea though.
Maybe people who don't have a home, use a shelter mailing address. Feel free to research my 6th grade level critical thinking on this topic
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
I've haven't done any research, no point, when I nail you with facts you dissappear. It's a MAGA trait clearly displayed in this forum. I have an idea though.
Maybe people who don't have a home, use a shelter mailing address. Feel free to research my 6th grade level critical thinking on this topic
When registering to vote you give an address in order to be assigned a precinct and your polling/voting station. When you show up to vote they ask for your ID (at least in my state) and compare it with your name and address on their book, a huge ledger type thing that has your name and address. If you aren't in the book you can't vote at that station, you have to vote where you ARE in the book. Most people know this if they have ever voted.
When the polling place changes, or your address changes, either way you receive notification of that change. Every person who sincerely wants to vote makes a plan to be able to do so, or needs to. I don't know where a homeless person votes. but if they are a registered voter they can find out when and where and be able to vote. If they aren't motivated to make such a plan then that's on them.
Regarding ID, I have a friend who works a polling site. She said if the person doesn't have ID they fill out a form, name and address, and are allowed to vote. The information goes somewhere to be determined if that vote is valid. in which case the vote will count. If not valid it will be tossed out. Nothing wrong with this process that I can figure.
We have early voting, weeks early, sufficient time for even a homeless person who is registered to make a plan to vote.
Candy
Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
When registering to vote you give an address in order to be assigned a precinct and your polling/voting station. When you show up to vote they ask for your ID (at least in my state) and compare it with your name and address on their book, a huge ledger type thing that has your name and address. If you aren't in the book you can't vote at that station, you have to vote where you ARE in the book. Most people know this if they have ever voted.
When the polling place changes, or your address changes, either way you receive notification of that change. Every person who sincerely wants to vote makes a plan to be able to do so, or needs to. I don't know where a homeless person votes. but if they are a registered voter they can find out when and where and be able to vote. If they aren't motivated to make such a plan then that's on them.
Regarding ID, I have a friend who works a polling site. She said if the person doesn't have ID they fill out a form, name and address, and are allowed to vote. The information goes somewhere to be determined if that vote is valid. in which case the vote will count. If not valid it will be tossed out. Nothing wrong with this process that I can figure.
We have early voting, weeks early, sufficient time for even a homeless person who is registered to make a plan to vote.
Candy
I was talking about 1,200 people at the same address. Much like a postal store can have 100's of people using that address
Crybaby MAGA upset about the elections again....and their evidence is the same too ! It takes the form of a question instead of a statement of fact. Tom is the master of this....well, he stole it from FOX News.
Get ready for the cop beating thugs to storm the Capital chasing another election denial.
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
I was talking about 1,200 people at the same address. Much like a postal store can have 100's of people using that address
1,200 people at addresses that have only 120 beds or no beds is a false address, much like 70 hospices at 1 storefront..
None of these are valid
Originally posted by: tom
1,200 people at addresses that have only 120 beds or no beds is a false address, much like 70 hospices at 1 storefront..
None of these are valid
How do you explain a postal store with 100 suite addresses but no suites?
Originally posted by: tom
1,200 people at addresses that have only 120 beds or no beds is a false address, much like 70 hospices at 1 storefront..
None of these are valid
Show me the law that backs up this statement.....or can we presume you pulled it out of your ass?
I know its the latter but I'll give you the chance to prove your work
Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
I was talking about 1,200 people at the same address. Much like a postal store can have 100's of people using that address
Understood. I was just clarifying the process. Just that, like the rest of us, voting requires exercising responsibility to register, know the issues one is voting for, have an opinion, plan to present at the correct polling place. Key word being plan. Every freedom, every blessing has responsibilities in order to derive benefit from it.
