So Ted ''Cancun'' Cruz was cheating on Heidi with Lauren Boebert?

What a bunch of scumbags the GOP is....

Stealing... Lying... Treason... Cheating... Cocaine sex parties...

https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-abortion-escort-claims-explained-muckrakers-1715956

Anyone who fucks Boebert, or comes within 100 yards of her for that matter, has a serious problem with taste. It's like having sex with the neighborhood dog(s).

Of course, voting for her is even worse. Nuke western Colorado from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Sugar Daddy Meet is a great site for sugar babies. 

Probably not true. One of the supposed photos of Broebert is actually of another woman. 

If it is totally debunked, I hope there are no sleazy types who continue to repeat the lie. If you do, I will call you Charles.

It does make sense that she worked as a hooker, since she couldn't hack it at McDonald's and failed to get her high school diploma.

She did have the street smarts to upgrade to a much more lucrative type of whoring when she ran for Congress as a Gun Love RepubliQ wackadoodle. So, props to her for that. And someone else administers those sloppy blowjobs that she used to have to provide for eight dollars behind the dumpster in back of McDonald's. Ambition--it's what made Amurrica great!

MP, let him have his fun after all elected Republicans and the conservative media are still promoting the big lie. 

I was suspicious of the story because it said she was working as a hooker on Sugar Daddy Meet.  You can't work as a hooker on those sites. They will ban you if you do. There are important disctinctions between a sugar realtionship and working as a prostitute. For starters one is legal and the other is not. 

A more credible version of this story has been circulating for some time.  In a nutshell it alludes that her relationship with her husband started as sugar relationship.  That her much spoken about restaurant never made a profit and was more of gimmick to launch her career. She was apparently rarely there unless the media was and her husband paid her employees with his personal funds. As supporting evidence, her former employees were cited.

If true, that is a more classic type of sugar realtionship. The old marry me baby and I will set you up in your own business. 

Anyway, in the midst of this new story I saw a picture Boebert in a bikini while she was in her  twenties.  It is not the fake one that has been circulating. All I will say is she was a very attractive young lady back then.

I wonder 🤔 who paid for those (o)(o)

It's not much of a distinction. If someone pays you to open your legs, that's prostitution even if that someone is your only customer. It's an arrangement as old as human history.

She may be/have been attractive, but her speech and behavior make her one of the ugliest people alive. It's how she works her passage. I'm sure she's calculated (or speculated, at least) that if she gets enough gun freak yahoos ginned up to give her donations, she can cut whatever whore-ties she still has with her sugar daddy.

People should object to Boebert because of what she says and does, not her former status as a hooker. Women who aren't bright enough to find other work but are nonetheless attractive choose that option all the time. The people who wrote that story are barking up the wrong tree--there's nothing dishonorable about Boebert turning tricks. And I would imagine that many if not most prostitutes dream of getting their hooks into one guy and draining his bank account, rather than fifteen blowjobs a night in the alley behind the local bar. So she's definitely been successful.

Kevin, I disagree otherwise every male female realtionship would be prostitution.

Doesn't everybody know the old three date rule?

And then there is the guy in a long-term relationship that is unhappy because hasn't gotten any sex lately. He books a suite at Bellagio, airfares and makes reservations at expensive restaurants in hopes of getting his gal to open her legs.  If the female gives it up in this scenario does that mean she is a prostitute?

That's why I found the Ted Cruz component of the story the more feasible part.

Ted says, "Hey, baby, date me and I'll get you started in conservative politics."

The difference between a prostitution agreement and a normal relationship is that in the former, one person promises another something of material value in exchange for sex. That's not "every male-female relationship." In the vast majority of such relationships, there is no material quid pro quo. Also, in the case of prostitution, the exchange is agreed upon up front. In your example, the answer is "no" because there is no explicit agreement. However, if the wining and dining stops and her legs slam shut, it was indeed a prostitution agreement, not a relationship.

Obviously, the line can be blurred. If a woman dates/fucks a guy she would otherwise have no interest in, but she enjoys/profits from the things he gives her and the experiences he provides, then yes, absolutely, unequivocally, she's a prostitute. That term gets dressed up in fancy clothes ("escort," "companion," "sugar daddy"), but it is what it is. Sex in return for material considerations. Again, I have no problem with that; I'm just saying it should be called what it is.

I have no difficulty in believing that the life-failure Boebert decided to use her one asset--her looks--to make a living. She decided to become a prostitute with one client, and it got her a restaurant. Good deal, assuming that fucking her cowboy daddy wasn't too disgusting.

Wow, you guys don't mind latching onto debunked stories because you REALLY want it to be true, and then you throw in a bit of misogyny while you're at it.

Are you sure you guys aren't Republicans?