Originally posted by: Mark
Tom, she was relaying what she saw and heard. That is first hand. And even second hand testimony is admissible against a party opponent in Federal Court. I don't doubt Fox is furiously trying to spin it after the fact. But I will refer you to what I said earlier. All these folks should go on record and testify under oath as to what they said and did but it seems they don't want to do that. I wonder 🤔 why?
Â
Â
 As usual, a post by Mark has been proven wrong. She lied and this is in the news and all over the internet.