Thugs have more rights

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Gee, people responded to Millerscum, and he reacted in exactly the way I predicted. Who knew!

 

The ludicrous argument Fox News lawyers made about Tucker Carlson--what a crock. They don't precede his nightly rants with a screen crawl: THE PROGRAM YOU ARE ABOUT TO VIEW IS COMPLETE, MADE-UP, FABRICATED BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA THAT HAS THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO REALITY AS GRIMM'S FAIRY TALES.

 

Of course, if they did do that, Davey Dog would trustingly believe it anyway.


  Another lie filled rant by Lewis - ignore him. Watch the video im my post or read Tom's post. 

Originally posted by: tom

Perhaps the liberals would prefer to see this video from CBS News. 

 

Bail was originally $500,000, eventually reduced to $50,000.  After an uproar, he is now out on bail.  NYC has been letting violent criminals out without bail for the last 2 years, but in this case, a man trying to defend himself was treated worse than the criminals.

 

 https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/jose-alba-bodega-worker-charged-murder-stabbing-killing-austin-simon-who-attacked-behind-counter-manhattan/


A person released from court, on bail OR on his own recognizance, isn't a "violent criminal" in the eyes of the law until he's actually convicted of a violent crime. He's released because the court evaluates the likelihood that he will return to court for his trial as required.

 

Stupid Tommie-poo seems to think that bail is some kind of pre-punishment. It's not--that's not its purpose.

 

So yeah, we liberals advocate obeying the courts' decisions. Judges don't poll the public to determine if an accused individual should be required to post bail. They make that decision themselves rather than getting the permission of the community's stupid Tommie-poos.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

A person released from court, on bail OR on his own recognizance, isn't a "violent criminal" in the eyes of the law until he's actually convicted of a violent crime. He's released because the court evaluates the likelihood that he will return to court for his trial as required.

 

Stupid Tommie-poo seems to think that bail is some kind of pre-punishment. It's not--that's not its purpose.

 

So yeah, we liberals advocate obeying the courts' decisions. Judges don't poll the public to determine if an accused individual should be required to post bail. They make that decision themselves rather than getting the permission of the community's stupid Tommie-poos.


        What an ignorant, lie filled post.

Then why was the Highland park shooter held without bail?

 

Why was the woman who stabbed Jose Alba not arrested?

 

Jose Alba is a hard working family man with ties to the community & no criminal record.  Why was he given $500,000 bail?

 

Most importantly why was a man who was protecting himself even arrested? 


Sorry boys but, Fox News is the #1 news network by a wide margin! It’s not even close.

Originally posted by: rdwoodpecker

Sorry boys but, Fox News is the #1 news network by a wide margin! It’s not even close.


Faux News is actual news from 1pm-2pm and 6pm-7pm.

All else is ''entertainment'' for morons.

Originally posted by: rdwoodpecker

Sorry boys but, Fox News is the #1 news network by a wide margin! It’s not even close.


All that means is that the number of drooling morons who watch "news" programs for entertainment and to make themselves feel smart (well, less dumb, anyway) is shockingly huge.

 

The actual news can be complex, disturbing at times, and difficult to understand, so I'm not surprised at all that the 75 million inbred mouth-breathers would rather be jacked off by Mother Tucker.

Originally posted by: tom

Then why was the Highland park shooter held without bail?

 

Why was the woman who stabbed Jose Alba not arrested?

 

Jose Alba is a hard working family man with ties to the community & no criminal record.  Why was he given $500,000 bail?

 

Most importantly why was a man who was protecting himself even arrested? 


A suspect is held without bail when the court considers him to be a flight risk. The court. Not some moronic nimrod posting on an internet message board.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

All that means is that the number of drooling morons who watch "news" programs for entertainment and to make themselves feel smart (well, less dumb, anyway) is shockingly huge.

 

The actual news can be complex, disturbing at times, and difficult to understand, so I'm not surprised at all that the 75 million inbred mouth-breathers would rather be jacked off by Mother Tucker.


  What it means is that Americans are tired of being lied to by the other so called media outlets - which, in reality, are nothing more but branches of the lying socialist DemocRatic party. 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

A suspect is held without bail when the court considers him to be a flight risk. The court. Not some moronic nimrod posting on an internet message board.


 

Why is a 21 year old with no passport or assets considered a "flight risk"? 

 

There are numerous NYC cases of actual criminals violating their bail & are rearrested for more crimes & are released again.

 

Third grade kevin still can't answer the real question is why was a person arrested & held on $500k for defending himself?

 

Why was the woman who stabbed Jose not arrested.

 

This is another example of DA bragg protecting the criminals & treating the victims as criminals

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now