Title 9 ridiculous policy

What one university does is indicative of absolutely nothing. Only a stupid fucking fool like yourself would make a false claim about a single school's policies and then claim it's some kind of national effect.

 

You actually don't know what or why is happening re transporting the Purdue athletes. Don't lie and pretend that you do.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Hey, let's look at stupid Tommie-poo's "source" to check its accuracy!

 

"Out of the 5,300 institutions in the USA, there are 1,626 public colleges, 1,687 private nonprofit schools, and 985 for-profit schools."

 

Anyone notice that whoever wrote that article can't add? There are also several childish grammar errors, indicating that whoever wrote this screed has no idea what he's talking about. But that's how stupid Tommie-poo rolls: he goes frantically casting about the interblab for something that appears to support his preconceived notions, then he seizes on it, usually not even actually reading it.

 

Stupid Tommie-poo.

 

And if Boiler or Tommie-poo had ever gone near a college or university, they would know that it's mandatory in every state for such institutions to disclose their financial records. I got the information I needed by making one phone call.

 

Stupid, stupid Tommie-poo.


Did you ask to look at the balance sheet to obtain that information you called about?  

Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33

Did you ask to look at the balance sheet to obtain that information you called about?  


I said I obtained that information when I was attending that university, not now. At the time, we got hit with a 20% tuition increase, and I wanted to know why. So I asked the bursar's office for the financial disclosures. I was fairly confident that I could get that information, since I had a direct financial stake and was enrolled there. I was somewhat surprised to learn that as this was a public university, anyone could request and obtain that information. I got the documents emailed to me within 48 hours.

 

It helped quite a bit that I had a fair amount of accounting experience. There was stuff buried in there like the "amortization" of the new $185 million basketball arena, which is just a way of spreading an expense over multiple years instead of when it was actually incurred (the university paid cash, not bonds, for the arena).

 

The worst part was that a 400-unit student housing complex had been shelved indefinitely in order to pay for the fucking basketball arena. So I wondered if at least, the goddman thing had made money in its first year of operation. The answer was, "fuck, no."

 

 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

What one university does is indicative of absolutely nothing. Only a stupid fucking fool like yourself would make a false claim about a single school's policies and then claim it's some kind of national effect.

 

You actually don't know what or why is happening re transporting the Purdue athletes. Don't lie and pretend that you do.


Kevin loves Title 9, yet has no idea how it works.

 

 


It helped quite a bit that I had a fair amount of accounting experience. There was stuff buried in there like the "amortization" of the new $185 million basketball arena

 

Amortization is for intangible assets.  Depreciation is for fixed assets such as a basketball arena.  Someone who took accounting 101 would know this.  kevin lies about his accounting background

Originally posted by: tom

It helped quite a bit that I had a fair amount of accounting experience. There was stuff buried in there like the "amortization" of the new $185 million basketball arena

 

Amortization is for intangible assets.  Depreciation is for fixed assets such as a basketball arena.  Someone who took accounting 101 would know this.  kevin lies about his accounting background


That's absolutely incorrect, stupid Tommie-poo. But I wasn't the one who called it "amortization"--which is why I put it in quotation marks. Amortization can also be used for debt.

 

You're waaaaaay too stupid to realize that I was criticizing classifying the asset as one whose cost could be amortized. It was a shell game.

 

Stupid Tommie-poo.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin loves Title 9, yet has no idea how it works.

 

 


Two lies in a single sentence!

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now