On the day of his arraignment. Time for a gag order.
On the day of his arraignment. Time for a gag order.
He still doesn't know what capitalization is. What a fucking moron.
Soon, he'll be silenced forever.
Chump shouldn't have committed his crimes in DC if he didn't want his trial to be there.
I do like the fact he admits he wants to Federalize blue cities.
Folks, here is a way to look at what is coming (and trust me, I am not a fan of Trump). Please read it through:
"It could be argued that many of Donald Trump's admirers support him because of his lack of manners--the indictment doesn't accuse him of being uncouth. It accuses him of crimes.
"So let him be judged. Let Donald Trump take his claims and his legal team to the courthouse and have his day in court. Or another day in court. (He has them regularly.) He should be given every opportunity every other defendant has. And allow the American people to see his defense. That would be fair. Fiercely fair. Ruthlessly fair.
"One might think that [he] would look forward to his defense in court. That way he could explain again, as he's been accused of saying in the indictment, that he won every state in the presidential election of 2020. By hundreds of thousands of votes no less. Something that even Reagan didn't do against Mondale! And it all was washed away because the government--Donald Trump's government, which he led as president--ruined an election for him. And all the campaign attorneys, and senior members of the Justice Department, the intel people at Homeland Security, the White House lawyers, and his own Cabinet were the conspirators, not him. Let him be judged. And see if a group of jurors can find any reason in that. Or beyond reasonable doubt."
This is a quote, not my words but I couldn't say it better. It is neither pro nor anti-Trump, it just says let him be judged in court, in front of anybody and everybody who cares to hear him testify. And we all can hear the same thing.
Candy
Nice post, Candy. Yup, let him have his day(s) in court and let's see what a jury says after they have heard from lawyers and viewed all the evidence.
Right. Then blindfold his orange face and do what needs to be done with traitors.
Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
Folks, here is a way to look at what is coming (and trust me, I am not a fan of Trump). Please read it through:
"It could be argued that many of Donald Trump's admirers support him because of his lack of manners--the indictment doesn't accuse him of being uncouth. It accuses him of crimes.
"So let him be judged. Let Donald Trump take his claims and his legal team to the courthouse and have his day in court. Or another day in court. (He has them regularly.) He should be given every opportunity every other defendant has. And allow the American people to see his defense. That would be fair. Fiercely fair. Ruthlessly fair.
"One might think that [he] would look forward to his defense in court. That way he could explain again, as he's been accused of saying in the indictment, that he won every state in the presidential election of 2020. By hundreds of thousands of votes no less. Something that even Reagan didn't do against Mondale! And it all was washed away because the government--Donald Trump's government, which he led as president--ruined an election for him. And all the campaign attorneys, and senior members of the Justice Department, the intel people at Homeland Security, the White House lawyers, and his own Cabinet were the conspirators, not him. Let him be judged. And see if a group of jurors can find any reason in that. Or beyond reasonable doubt."
This is a quote, not my words but I couldn't say it better. It is neither pro nor anti-Trump, it just says let him be judged in court, in front of anybody and everybody who cares to hear him testify. And we all can hear the same thing.
Candy
Reasonable perspective..I agree.
A guy can't be facing charges in 4 different places (D.C., New York, Georgia and Florida), indicted 3 times, and be innocent. This is not a witchhunt as Reps will want everyone to believe, but walls falling down around a guy that did some wack BS and is finally getting held accountable for it.
Did anybody in 2016 think Trump was a good guy? I certainly didn't.
Originally posted by: Charles Higgins
Reasonable perspective..I agree.
But not a persepctive that will be held by the 75 million collective-IQ-of-12 goobers who will continue to worship the Orange Turd quite literally no matter what. You know what they'll say. The trial was rigged. The jury was rigged. The judge was rigged. The twelve-masted frigate with forty cannons was rigged. Blah blah blah belech grunt snort. Witch hunt. Bitch hunt. Mitch hunt. Snitch hunt.
Trumphole said that any election he lost would be ipso facto unfair. It's only a matter of time before he says something similar about his trial(s). He's already whined and whined and whined and whined and whined about how "unfairly" he's been treated.
So I say, fine. You don't respect or believe in democracy or justice, and in point of fact have repeatedly shat on both. You have therefore forfeited the right to either. Strip him naked, tie him to a stake, pour honey on him, then dump a huge jar of fire ants on him. Sell it on pay-per-view (I suggest $19.95) to help reduce the deficit that he created. Perhaps before we do that, pour A-1 sauce on his genitals and introduce him to a rabid wolverine.
I don't think that allowing the Turd to thread the passages of American jurisprudence will make a single American think that he's guilty if they didn't before. It certainly won't make anyone think that he isn't, given the inevitability of the outcome. So it's all ultimately pointless. It's like the Nuremberg trials. I suppose we had to make a show of it (and it made for a good movie), but what did it prove that just putting a bullet it their heads wouldn't have? Did any of the sixty million they killed get a fair trial?
