Originally posted by: Boilerman
Let's make the bet a well vodka tonic.
You have to define "recovers." Actually takes it into his possession? Blowing something up and proclaiming victory won't cut it.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Let's make the bet a well vodka tonic.
You have to define "recovers." Actually takes it into his possession? Blowing something up and proclaiming victory won't cut it.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I alway ask PJ to put money behind his mouth...and he tells us that he's not a gambler. I'll bet $500 to be paid at the Indy location of PJ'S choosing, that Trump recovers about 950# of highly enriched uranium. The interested reader might read the previous PJ comment and his next or lack of response.
Ill take that bet and you can pay me now. Even if by some miracle Iran surrenders their Uranium nobody is going to get to it while Trump is alive.
Boilerman's Republican Senator, Todd Young, who is on the intelligence committee says everything I have from day 1. There was no imminent threat. Trump just wanted to invade Iran because he thought it would be easy. We're spending a billion a day on a ridiculous war of choice.
I have another $500 bet. When Democrats take control in 2028 Boilerman is going to complain every day about government spending after cheering for this fiscal bomb in addition to the multi-trillion dollar on in Iraq prior. He has a long history of that.
I'll post this for the third time, tends to make our MAGA folks disappear:
Uh-oh, MAGA under oath, not good for them.
Gabbard avoids answering whether Iran posed an 'imminent threat' - ABC News
"Gabbard also contradicted the president's claim that Iran was restarting its nuclear weapons program.
"They were warned to make no future attempts to rebuild their weapons program and in particular nuclear weapons," Trump said during his State of the Union speech days before launching the war. "Yet they continue, they’re starting it all over."
But Gabbard told Congress on Wednesday in her written testimony that Iran has actually made "no efforts" to rebuild its nuclear enrichment program.
"That's the assessment of the intelligence community?" Sen. Ossoff asked.
"Yes," Gabbard replied.
Ratcliffe said the regime halted enrichment of its nuclear material. Tehran has "been unwilling and incapable of enriching uranium to 60% as a result of" last summer's strikes, he told senators."
David Miller is a huge supporter of Tulsi:
Gabbard testified under oath that Trump has been lying about Iran.
Can't have that! Adios!
If we charged every US adult over the age of 21 $100/month to pay for the Iran war (the current cost)...how popular do you think it would be with all the MAGA cheerleaders?
Answer: not very. We'll just throw it on the credit card like the Iraq War. And Republicans will run again in 2028 on a platform of cutting spending.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
If we charged every US adult over the age of 21 $100/month to pay for the Iran war (the current cost)...how popular do you think it would be with all the MAGA cheerleaders?
Answer: not very. We'll just throw it on the credit card like the Iraq War. And Republicans will run again in 2028 on a platform of cutting spending.
Especially not when you add that to the additional $200 or so per month every adult person is spending on food and gas.
That's a grand total of $3600 per year down the toilet for no good reason. MAGA must be so proud!
Originally posted by: MaxFlavorMaxFlavorDavid Miller
I'll post this for the third time, tends to make our MAGA folks disappear:
Uh-oh, MAGA under oath, not good for them.
Gabbard avoids answering whether Iran posed an 'imminent threat' - ABC News
"Gabbard also contradicted the president's claim that Iran was restarting its nuclear weapons program.
"They were warned to make no future attempts to rebuild their weapons program and in particular nuclear weapons," Trump said during his State of the Union speech days before launching the war. "Yet they continue, they’re starting it all over."
But Gabbard told Congress on Wednesday in her written testimony that Iran has actually made "no efforts" to rebuild its nuclear enrichment program.
"That's the assessment of the intelligence community?" Sen. Ossoff asked.
"Yes," Gabbard replied.
Ratcliffe said the regime halted enrichment of its nuclear material. Tehran has "been unwilling and incapable of enriching uranium to 60% as a result of" last summer's strikes, he told senators."
David Miller is a huge supporter of Tulsi:
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Trump's Director of National Intelligence
1Another exceptional American has joined the Trump administration. President Trump has assembled a great Cabinet who will help in making America great again. -- https://mxmnews.com/article/e4f3edc1-2f94-4464-b5eb-004fea4af2d9?tulsi-gabbard-confirmed-as-trump-s-director-of-national-intelligence
Uh-oh, MAGA under oath, not good for them.
Gabbard avoids answering whether Iran posed an 'imminent threat' - ABC News
"Gabbard also contradicted the president's claim that Iran was restarting its nuclear weapons program.
"They were warned to make no future attempts to rebuild their weapons program and in particular nuclear weapons," Trump said during his State of the Union speech days before launching the war. "Yet they continue, they’re starting it all over."
But Gabbard told Congress on Wednesday in her written testimony that Iran has actually made "no efforts" to rebuild its nuclear enrichment program.
"That's the assessment of the intelligence community?" Sen. Ossoff asked.
"Yes," Gabbard replied.
Ratcliffe said the regime halted enrichment of its nuclear material. Tehran has "been unwilling and incapable of enriching uranium to 60% as a result of" last summer's strikes, he told senators."
Another exceptional American has joined the Trump administration. President Trump has assembled a great Cabinet who will help in making America great again. -- https://mxmnews.com/article/e4f3edc1-2f94-4464-b5eb-004fea4af2d9?tulsi-gabbard-confirmed-as-trump-s-director-of-national-intelligence
This is when David goes silent usually......
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
The regime isn't going to suffer at all. The Iranian people will. So will the world's economies.
There are no such people as "Liberals."
I'm sad that Trump is fucking over the average citizen. Nobody wants to have their pockets drained just so he can kill schoolgirls.
Trump will win against evil, which makes Kevin sad.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Trump will win against evil, which makes Kevin sad.
😂 Trump is evil incarnate.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Trump will win against evil, which makes Kevin sad.
Wait, Trump is going to beat himself? .....okay, that didn't sound right. Not sure he could do it anyway.