The guy is a real hard ass too. He prosecuted war criminals before he got picked for this job.
Edited on Nov 18, 2022 4:00pm
The guy is a real hard ass too. He prosecuted war criminals before he got picked for this job.
Originally posted by: Mark
The guy is a real hard ass too. He prosecuted war crimes before he got picked for this job.
Robert Mueller was supposed to be a "real hard ass" too - how did that work out?
He found that Trump had committed eleven felonies.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Robert Mueller was supposed to be a "real hard ass" too - how did that work out?
This time there is no Bill Barr to lie about his findings. And the big deal is they wouldn't have appointmented one if the evidence in their on going investigation didn't indicate he committed a crime. They are going indict him on one more offense.
Originally posted by: Mark
This time there is no Bill Barr to lie about his findings. And the big deal is they wouldn't have appointmented one if the evidence in their on going investigation didn't indicate he committed a crime. They are going indict him on one more offense.
Bill Bar did not answer the question on national television - Mueller did.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Bill Bar did not answer the question on national television - Mueller did.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.” - Robert Mueller, May 29, 2019
Originally posted by: David Miller
Bill Bar did not answer the question on national television - Mueller did.
So what? Barr was the one who declined to prosecute his master.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
So what? Barr was the one who declined to prosecute his master.
Mueller provided no proof of Russian collusion - therefore Barr had no legal grounds to prosecute - case closed.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Mueller provided no proof of Russian collusion - therefore Barr had no legal grounds to prosecute - case closed.
For the strict definition of criminal collusion? Yes.
For obstruction of justice? No. Mueller did not go into that because the DOJ policy would not have allowed them to indict a current President.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
For the strict definition of criminal collusion? Yes.
For obstruction of justice? No. Mueller did not go into that because the DOJ policy would not have allowed them to indict a current President.
Bullshit, and you know it.
