Trump is getting a special prosecutor for Christmas!

Originally posted by: David Miller

 Bullshit, and you know it.


Apparently, Robert Mueller doesn't know it:

 

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.”

 

"The President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.”

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Apparently, Robert Mueller doesn't know it:

 

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.”

 

"The President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.”


  Wher was the Russian collusion again? Huh? Where? 

Davee-Boi is in panic mode again.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  Wher was the Russian collusion again? Huh? Where? 


Obstruction. Of. Justice.

 

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.” 

 

"The President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.”


David knows his orange hero is a criminal. That's not was this thread is about. It's about David desperately craving attention. Why else would he start twenty threads a day?

 

Of course, all we do is ignore him or laugh at him.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

So what? Barr was the one who declined to prosecute his master.


Here's what Bill Barr had to say about his master yesterday. Some people, over time, have the capacity to grow and learn from past errors and are capable of redemption:


                    --------------
William Barr, Donald Trump's Attorney General suggested it is "increasingly likely" that the DOJ will indict Trump in the classified documents case. "I think that they probably have the basis for legitimately indicting the president," he said, adding that the case may involve "serious charges."

The former attorney general said it would be a "tragedy" if Donald Trump, is the GOP's 2024 presidential nominee.

He said he has not seen evidence that proves the former president was involved in a criminal scheme to stop the electoral vote count, though he said "certainly the president  precipitated it."

Asked whether it is ever appropriate to indict a former president, Barr told the show, "Oh, yes," especially in the case of a "serious crime."

Originally posted by: Jeff

Here's what Bill Barr had to say about his master yesterday. Some people, over time, have the capacity to grow and learn from past errors and are capable of redemption:


                    --------------
William Barr, Donald Trump's Attorney General suggested it is "increasingly likely" that the DOJ will indict Trump in the classified documents case. "I think that they probably have the basis for legitimately indicting the president," he said, adding that the case may involve "serious charges."

The former attorney general said it would be a "tragedy" if Donald Trump, is the GOP's 2024 presidential nominee.

He said he has not seen evidence that proves the former president was involved in a criminal scheme to stop the electoral vote count, though he said "certainly the president  precipitated it."

Asked whether it is ever appropriate to indict a former president, Barr told the show, "Oh, yes," especially in the case of a "serious crime."


        Another witch hunt as the DemocRats try to cover their asses. Face it, you, along with others, have bought into the lies of the DemocRats and the media. But don't take my word for it, for in the ensuing months the facts will prove where the real guilt lies. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Brainwashed idiot

Originally posted by: Vegas Todd

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Brainwashed idiot


  You certainly are.

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Obstruction. Of. Justice.

 

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.” 

 

"The President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.”


Hey David,  maybe you missed this. Obstruction of justice found by Mueller, but he chose not to prosecute because he was a sitting president.

 

Any comments?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now