The Turd has restarted his war---big surprise!

Well, that ceasefire didn't last long, and the negotiations were a sham. I don't even care who violated the ceasefire. Neither Trump nor Iran nor Israel could be trusted.

So, back to high gas prices and Trumpflation! Wheeeeeee!! (Oh, right, it doesn't matter, it's only "temporary." Belch grunt snort.)

     I knew that Lying Lewis would blame President Trump for Iran violating the cease fire agreement - I am only surprised that it took so long for him to start bleating.

Of COURSE it's his fault. The war is his fault. 

He keeps escalating his demands, without realizing that Iran has him over a barrel. Iran's recent attack on a cargo ship came after Trump made a new demand, reneging on the existing ceasefire agreement. Iran has no particular reason to comply, and Trump can't dictate to or bully them.

Iran knows that any agreement Trump makes isn't worth two grams of donkey shit. They also know that he's enjoying his war too much to stop it.

I knew that Millerscum would leap to the defense of the orange pedo whose dick he so lovingly and faithfully sucks.

Iran launched drones at commercial ships thereby violating the cease fire protocol. So they got more of their assets blown up in retaliation.This conflict is simply outrageously ongoing.

I think we now have the record for most declared victories in history for the same war.    

Go 'Merica !

Right on...pass the gravy.

The drone strikes were in retaliation for Trump making new demands that weren't part of the ceasefire agreement. And the Turd of course retaliated.

Maybe he could have held off? But we know he was butt-hurt by the rebuke he had just received from the Senate (he spent an entire day screaming at the senators who had voted to check his war powers).

Peaceful solutions, diplomacy...they're just not part of his skill set. And Iran simply doesn't care. So this war will go on. And on. And on. 

Oh, wait, it's all cool, because it's not a war  😄😄😄😄😄😄

 Just how stupid is this comment from Lewis? --- "The drone strikes were in retaliation for Trump making new demands that weren't part of the ceasefire agreement." -- Lewis thinks that retaliating for WORDS is justification for drone strikes? 

If those words are a betrayal of an agreement, yes indeedy. Wars have been started and restarted for less.

Trump, in the midst of being rebuked by the Senate, made new demands that weren't part of the existing proposed agreement. Iran responded, not by kissing his toes as he always expects, but by resuming hostilities.

Whether either side's aggressions are "justified" is beside the point. I'm not saying whether Iran's OR the Fucking Turd's actions are justified, and I don't care. All I know is that neither side trusts the other, and neither side has any reason to. Trump is a liar and a grifter. Iran is run by violent crazies. Neither can be believed or trusted.

@ Kevin

To which specific new Trump demands are you referring? How and where did you get that information?

Iran obviously doesn't care..they continue to jeopardize their remaining few assets on a daily basis. Their long-standing "Death to Israel" and "Death to America" chants are representative of their heartfelt base ideology which is centered around Anti-Western and Anti-Zionist philosophies. In the past they chanted these phrases when their parliament convened. They're serious about it. And they may eventually be completely annihilated because of it. They've murdered and tortured American citizens in the past.  This current  thing has evolved into an historic debacle and is well..tragic. They exhibit very little if any bend (neither does Trump, summarily) and their citizens suffer the most ( the remaining ones that their current regime hasn't murdered..as yet). Trump obviously made some concessions to arrive at the eventual MOU thing with all its vagaries ( to the point where it looked like the US gained very little if anything from the overall conflict besides proof of military superiority); Trump obviously wanted more from them than specifically outlined in said MOU.  I don't know WTF to expect other than more daily conflict, more military incursions with additive things on fire,  and fluctuating gas prices here at home because of it.

The historical tentacles of this Islamic mindset goes back way before 1979 ( the so-called Iranian Revolution and the emergence of the Ayatollah); some aspects date back to BC times. In light of that, how much can / should we expect in terms of 'willingness to change' from these people? My guess is not very damned much. Lemmings over a cliff? Cornwallis surrounded at Yorktown? I don't know.