The Turd has restarted his war---big surprise!

Originally posted by: Nines

@ Kevin

 

To which specific new Trump demands are you referring? How and where did you get that information?

 

Iran obviously doesn't care..they continue to jeopardize their remaining few assets on a daily basis. Their long-standing "Death to Israel" and "Death to America" chants are representative of their heartfelt base ideology which is centered around Anti-Western and Anti-Zionist philosophies. In the past they chanted these phrases when their parliament convened. They're serious about it. And they may eventually be completely annihilated because of it.  This current  thing has evolved into an historic debacle and is well..tragic. They exhibit very little if any bend (neither does Trump, summarily) and their citizens suffer the most ( the remaining ones that their current regime hasn't murdered..as yet). Trump obviously made some concessions to arrive at the eventual MOU thing with all its vagaries ( to the point where it looked like the US gained very little if anything from the overall conflict besides military superiority), but obviously wanted more from them. I don't know WTF to expect other than more daily conflict and fluctuating gas prices here at home because of it.

 

The historical tentacles of this Islamic mindset goes back way before 1979 ( the so-called Iranian Revolution and the emergence of the Ayatollah); some aspects date back to BC times. In light of that, how much can / should we expect in terms of 'willingness to change' from these people? My guess is not very damned much. 

 

 


I'm referring to the instructions the Turd gave to his delegation (wherever they were at the time: Switzerland, France, Pakistan, Mars; whatever), as well as his unhinged ravings on "Truth Social," in the 48 hours before Iran fired that drone. He insisted on several conditions that Iran had already said were non-starters, such as removal of all Iranian missile launchers and Iran not having a navy. There was more babble, and I just had lunch, so I don't want to go back and read it again.

 

As far as "new" demands are concerned, there really weren't any--just a pivot back to the Turd's original screeds when he first launched his war. Complete control of Iran. We get all their oil. Rape camps set up throughout the country. Et cetera.

 

In response to any complaints about how unhinged and radical the Islamic State is, I want to point out that it wasn't all that long ago that Christianity was equally fanatical and violent. I would also resist the idea that Islam itself is a kookoobird "mindset" and has been for centuries. Iran is an aberration, not the norm.

 

And as long as we label them "fanatical crazies," what chance is there for peaceful negotiations with them--however accurate that label may be?

Originally posted by: Nines

@ Kevin

 

To which specific new Trump demands are you referring? How and where did you get that information?

 

Iran obviously doesn't care..they continue to jeopardize their remaining few assets on a daily basis. Their long-standing "Death to Israel" and "Death to America" chants are representative of their heartfelt base ideology which is centered around Anti-Western and Anti-Zionist philosophies. In the past they chanted these phrases when their parliament convened. They're serious about it. And they may eventually be completely annihilated because of it. They've murdered and tortured American citizens in the past.  This current  thing has evolved into an historic debacle and is well..tragic. They exhibit very little if any bend (neither does Trump, summarily) and their citizens suffer the most ( the remaining ones that their current regime hasn't murdered..as yet). Trump obviously made some concessions to arrive at the eventual MOU thing with all its vagaries ( to the point where it looked like the US gained very little if anything from the overall conflict besides proof of military superiority); Trump obviously wanted more from them than specifically outlined in said MOU.  I don't know WTF to expect other than more daily conflict, more military incursions with additive things on fire,  and fluctuating gas prices here at home because of it.

 

The historical tentacles of this Islamic mindset goes back way before 1979 ( the so-called Iranian Revolution and the emergence of the Ayatollah); some aspects date back to BC times. In light of that, how much can / should we expect in terms of 'willingness to change' from these people? My guess is not very damned much. Lemmings over a cliff? I don't know.

 

 


  The Middle East has been in turmoil over religion for centuries. Europe, America and the rest of the world have not allowed themselves to be caught up in their madness - until now. President Trump is doing the right thing after so many Presidents have done nothing more but give lip service to the terrorist actions of Iran. Now that Iran is/was on the verge of developing an atomic bomb, President Trump has said enough is enough. Here in the Sink and throughout the DemocRAT party we hear nothing but how stopping Iran now is wrong. Apparently you naysayers would rather wait until Iran started using atomic weapons before you would wake up to say "somebody should have done something before Iran had the bomb". And, of course President Trump would be the scapegoat. One thing is for certain - this "conflict" is far from over. The US will have to continue to esculate  this "conmflict" until the insane religeous "Death to America" animals are eradicated and Iran is allowed to be governed by sane human beings chosen by the Iranian people. The future of the Middle East , America and the rest of the world depends upon the eradication of the religeous, insane zealots who have controlled Iran the past 4+ decades.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  The Middle East has been in turmoil over religion for centuries. Europe, America and the rest of the world have not allowed themselves to be caught up in their madness - until now. President Trump is doing the right thing after so many Presidents have done nothing more but give lip service to the terrorist actions of Iran. Now that Iran is/was on the verge of developing an atomic bomb, President Trump has said enough is enough. Here in the Sink and throughout the DemocRAT party we hear nothing but how stopping Iran now is wrong. Apparently you naysayers would rather wait until Iran started using atomic weapons before you would wake up to say "somebody should have done something before Iran had the bomb". And, of course President Trump would be the scapegoat. One thing is for certain - this "conflict" is far from over. The US will have to continue to esculate  this "conmflict" until the insane religeous "Death to America" animals are eradicated and Iran is allowed to be governed by sane human beings chosen by the Iranian people. The future of the Middle East , America and the rest of the world depends upon the eradication of the religeous, insane zealots who have controlled Iran the past 4+ decades.


Why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons but Iran isn't? Why aren't we bombing Russia? They're Big Baddies, too.

 

Despite decades of Republican ideology, we don't get to tell the rest of the world what to do.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Why are we allowed to have nuclear weapons but Iran isn't? Why aren't we bombing Russia? They're Big Baddies, too.

 

Despite decades of Republican ideology, we don't get to tell the rest of the world what to do.


   So, you are of the opinion that Iran - the source of 47+ years of terror and bloodshed - should have an atomic bomb?  You are sicker than I thought.


Originally posted by: David Miller

   So, you are of the opinion that Iran - the source of 47+ years of terror and bloodshed - should have an atomic bomb?  You are sicker than I thought.


Any nation that is not a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty may arm themselves in any way they see fit. That's the determination of the UN as well as a century of international law. How you or I feel about that is irrelevant.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Any nation that is not a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty may arm themselves in any way they see fit. That's the determination of the UN as well as a century of international law. How you or I feel about that is irrelevant.


       So then you advocate for Iran to have an atomic bomb. 

Originally posted by: David Miller

       So then you advocate for Iran to have an atomic bomb. 


Nope. I didn't say that at all. I said that we have no right to prevent it.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Nope. I didn't say that at all. I said that we have no right to prevent it.


         Of course we do. But your idiotic response is not unexpected.

Originally posted by: David Miller

         Of course we do. But your idiotic response is not unexpected.


What gives us that right?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now