What is holding up the election results in California, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado and New York - all of which happen to be DemocRat controlled states, which I am sure it is just a coincidence .....
Edited on Nov 14, 2022 2:22am
What is holding up the election results in California, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado and New York - all of which happen to be DemocRat controlled states, which I am sure it is just a coincidence .....
Dont worry, David. SOmeone is looking into it !
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Dont worry, David. SOmeone is looking into it !
I was mistaken, I thought that someone would have an intelligent response.
Try doing some research, Idiot.
Originally posted by: Vegas Todd
Try doing some research, Idiot.
Explain yourself, Toad.
Originally posted by: David Miller
What is holding up the election results in California, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado and New York - all of which happen to be DemocRat controlled states, which I am sure it is just a coincidence .....
Counting mailed-in ballots, which by law have several days to arrive as long as they're postmarked by Election Day.
It's not a coincidence. RepubliQ asshole red states have voter suppression laws that severely restrict mail-in voting. The idea is that they can count all the in-person votes and declare a RepubliQ victory, aka the "red mirage."
The states you mentioned, not being run by the RepubliQ, are democracies. In a democracy, every vote counts; so every vote is tabulated. Even those of, say, black people.
Glad I could explain this to you.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Counting mailed-in ballots, which by law have several days to arrive as long as they're postmarked by Election Day.
It's not a coincidence. RepubliQ asshole red states have voter suppression laws that severely restrict mail-in voting. The idea is that they can count all the in-person votes and declare a RepubliQ victory, aka the "red mirage."
The states you mentioned, not being run by the RepubliQ, are democracies. In a democracy, every vote counts; so every vote is tabulated. Even those of, say, black people.
Glad I could explain this to you.
In all of the states "still counting", all of the other other House and Senate races that have been voted on in each of these states have been determined. These House races that have not declared the winner were on the same ballots, therefore their counts should also have been completed and the winners named. Everything else you allude to here has nothing to do with my question.
Originally posted by: David Miller
In all of the states "still counting", all of the other other House and Senate races that have been voted on in each of these states have been determined. These House races that have not declared the winner were on the same ballots, therefore their counts should also have been completed and the winners named. Everything else you allude to here has nothing to do with my question.
Let me try not to use big words here. If a winner is declared, it's because one candidate's lead is large enough that the remaining ballots couldn't affect the outcome--though those ballots will indeed be counted. Conversely, if the race is close enough that those ballots could conceivably affect the outcome, no official declaration of a winner is made until those votes are counted.
It's quite common for races to be decided early while others are too close to call for several days.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Let me try not to use big words here. If a winner is declared, it's because one candidate's lead is large enough that the remaining ballots couldn't affect the outcome--though those ballots will indeed be counted. Conversely, if the race is close enough that those ballots could conceivably affect the outcome, no official declaration of a winner is made until those votes are counted.
It's quite common for races to be decided early while others are too close to call for several days.
For example, there are several House races that have been declared, with some of them extremely close (New York, Colorado) What is the holdup for the ones that has not been declared? ( I have used "little" words here so that you can comprehend what is being discussed here).
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Let me try not to use big words here. If a winner is declared, it's because one candidate's lead is large enough that the remaining ballots couldn't affect the outcome--though those ballots will indeed be counted. Conversely, if the race is close enough that those ballots could conceivably affect the outcome, no official declaration of a winner is made until those votes are counted.
It's quite common for races to be decided early while others are too close to call for several days.
Let the idiot figure it out for herself.
