Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33
1) We should have never shut down for 6 weeks. It didn't solve a damn thing like I was saying back then. And that proved to be right of course now as the pandemic has ranged on for two years after. It did nothing but create a big handout that the libs wanted so badly and always want.
2) Millions of people got stimulus that didn't need it.
3) Thousands of people milked U/C and there was a TON of fraud in most states with it too.
4) PPP was received by thousands of businesses that had no business asking for it.
All that was a shit ton of $ dumped into the economy that didn't need it and fed into the inflation we are seeing now.
1) The shutdown was imposed during a period when we didn't know how to treat the disease. A LOT MORE people would have died if we hadn't locked everything down to give our medical facilities and workers a break. As it was, they were almost overwhelmed, but held on--barely. A FREEDUMB approach would have stretched the medical system to the breaking point.
2) Who was going to decide whether people got the stimulus or not? YOU??? LOL, LOL, LOL, as they say.
3) Likewise, who was going to decide whether someone "deserved" unemployment compensation?
4) Or whether a business "deserved" pandemic-related assistance?
Jerry, you make two unfounded assumptions here. Allow me to school you:
a) In the first place, it's almost impossible to determine who should be "worthy" of assistance and who should not. But let's say that the stimulus or UI money went to someone who didn't need it. What were they going to do with that money? Spend it. That kept businesses afloat and enabled them to go on paying their employees. Yeah, I know, that was a terrible terrible thing.
b) During that time, people, kept away from experiences such as travel and entertainment, sought to buy durable goods instead. Now, that money is disproportionately chasing the abovementioned experiences and "soft," or perishable, goods. And those expeditures are much more subject to inflation than "hard" goods, because of greater elasticity of demand. To put it simply, people generally don't buy two washing machines, or refrain from buying one altogether, even if the price of a washing machine changes drastically. But people will buy a LOT more pizza, airline flights, shoes, etc. when times are good. Right now, because of the skewed nature of buying and availability in 2020-2021, that money you decry is chasing primarily "soft" goods. Where you go off the rails is in assuming that it wouldn't be happening without the pandemic assistance money. Wrong! It was inevitable regardless, once the pandemic eased.
You're a wee bit too intelligent to buy into the standard conservitard shibboleth that money given to those who don't "deserve" it is somehow wasted, that those undeserving scumbags set fire to it or something. The reality is that that money gets spent, and that it turn benefits everyone. Conservitards are always outraged when people they don't like (i.e., everyone who isn't a conservitard) get money from the government, but the truth is that everyone benefits.
If you doubt all this, do a little reading on the economic multiplier effect.