Who's the challenger?

Let's assume the Orange Turd remains free at least long enough to be nominated at the Republihole convention. Who do you think is going to be his strongest challenger?

Right now, the only ones I see with a shot are Florida Man (but his thousands of flaws are obvious) and Mommy Swami (but his shtick is pretty much that he wants to be a carbon copy of Trump). I don't see anyone else.

Of course, this means that the Turd gets the nomination for a third time, a development I would welcome. Sort of like knowing that your favorite team will be playing against a gang of retarded cripples.

The problem I see with Trump as the Republican nominee is the amount of violence and unrest he will cause. 

Mark, you are correct that Liberals are a violent group.  To confirm this, one only needs to look at past BLM riot videos.  Libs may bring up 1/6 in their defence, but the violence scale is at minimum 10 to 1, Lib violence vs so called Conservative violence.

10 to 1 margin according to.....the garbage teevee news you watch? Well of course!

Take a look at Asa Hutchinson.  Problems: name recognition and fund raising, compared to the 'front runners'.  Pros include relevant education/experience, moral background, showed well in the debate.  One of only two who spoke up for border control during the debate.

A quality person with relevant experience.  Could he beat Biden?  Not likely.

Candy   

According to Time Magazine there were 7,750 blm protests. 7% or 512 turned into riots vs 1 Republican riot. 20 people were killed in blm vs 1. According to Homeland Security over 200 federal buildings were damaged vs 1.  Billions in damages vs a few million. Many downtown areas still haven't returned to their previous levels. 

So which was worse?

Pretty obvious.  

The goober MAGA protest was worse, because it was not only illegal but treasonous and seditious. ALL the BLM protests were 100% legal--people exercising their rights.

Of course, the latter were performed by black people, so you think they were worse--you racist fuck.

I just want to know what "border control" is supposed to look like and what benefit it will confer. We in fact have border controls already. The fact that we don't sow the entire length of the border with antipersonnel mines and patrol it with drones that can explode people's heads like overripe melons means to some people that we have "open borders." That some poor bozo comes here and operates a taco truck in San Diego means "THAR A'TAKIN ARE JOBZ!!!!" Is this ever a subject that's dealt with rationally?

I don't know much about Hutchinson, but I guarantee you that if he speaks calmly and rationally and he professes a wish to deal with actual issues instead of virtue signaling and culture wars, he has no prayer with the RepubliQ. They want red meat, WOKE WOKE WOKE WOKE WOKE, and a reason to hate. Anybody.

Sometimes you have to look into things further.  You and I, Kevin, are the only ones to name a "challenger" suggestion.  The rest was just name calling at each other.  How I'll feel by election day is uncertain, but at least I gave an opinion, right or wrong in your eyes.   Though I may not agree with you or anyone, I appreciate the opportunity for discussion.   I hoped it would be more "discussion" than name calling.  Thanks for the question.

Candy