BLM backs down in Nevada Cattle roundup

Any comments on this Story?

Federal land managers say "escalating tensions" led them to release all 400 or so head of cattle rounded up on public land in southern Nevada from a rancher who has refused to recognize their authority.

Bureau of Land Management Chief Neil Kornze announced an abrupt halt to the weeklong roundup just hours before the release.

"Based on information about conditions on the ground and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concerns about the safety of employees and members of the public," Kornze said in a statement.

Hundreds of states' rights protesters, including militia members, showed up at corrals outside Mesquite to demand the animals' return to rancher Cliven Bundy. Some protesters were armed with handguns and rifles at the corrals and at an earlier nearby rally.

Las Vegas Police Lt. Dan Zehnder said the showdown was resolved with no injuries and no violence. Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie was able to negotiate a resolution after talking with Bundy, he said.

The fight between Bundy and the Bureau of Land Management widened into a debate about states' rights and federal land-use policy. The dispute that ultimately triggered the roundup dates to 1993, when the bureau cited concern for the federally protected tortoise in the region. The bureau revoked Bundy's grazing rights after he stopped paying grazing fees and disregarded federal court orders to remove his animals.

Kornze's announcement came after Bundy repeatedly promised to "do whatever it takes" to protect his property and after a string of raucous confrontations between his family members and supporters and federal agents during the weeklong operation.

Bundy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Republican Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval issued a statement praising the agency for its willingness to listen to the state's concerns. He earlier criticized the agency for creating "an atmosphere of intimidation" and trying to confine protesters to a fenced-in "First Amendment area" well away from the sprawling roundup area.

"The safety of all individuals involved in this matter has been my highest priority," Sandoval said. "Given the circumstances, today's outcome is the best we could have hoped for."

Nevada's congressional delegation urged the protesters to be calm and to leave the area.

"The dispute is over, the BLM is leaving, but emotions and tensions are still near the boiling point, and we desperately need a peaceful conclusion to this conflict," U.S. Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., said in a statement. "I urge all the people involved to please return to your homes and allow the BLM officers to collect their equipment and depart without interference."

The 400 cows gathered during the roundup were short of the BLM's goal of 900 cows that it says have been trespassing on U.S. land without required grazing permits for over 20 years.

Bundy, 67, doesn't recognize federal authority on land he insists belongs to Nevada. His Mormon family has operated a ranch since the 1870s near the small town of Bunkerville and the Utah and Arizona lines.

"Good morning America, good morning world, isn't it a beautiful day in Bunkerville?" Bundy told a cheering crowd after his cattle were released, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The crowd protesting Saturday recited the pledge of allegiance, and many offered prayers. Others waved placards reading, "This land is your land," and "We teach our children not to bully. How do we teach our government not to be big bullies?" according to the newspaper.

It's the latest skirmish since the 1980s when the Sagebrush Rebellion challenged federal ownership of Nevada rangeland ranchers said was rightfully theirs.

A federal judge in Las Vegas first ordered Bundy to remove his trespassing cattle in 1998. The bureau was implementing two federal court orders last year to remove Bundy's cattle after making repeated efforts to resolve the matter outside court, Kornze said, adding the rancher has not paid grazing fees in 20 years.

"This is a matter of fairness and equity, and we remain disappointed that Cliven Bundy continues to not comply with the same laws that 16,000 public-lands ranchers do every year," Kornze said. "After 20 years and multiple court orders to remove the trespass cattle, Mr. Bundy owes the American taxpayers in excess of $1 million. The BLM will continue to work to resolve the matter administratively and judicially."

___

I saw this parts of this story from the beginning and I give the end a huge . While others embrace big govt. I hate most of it. Funny, I just a saw a stack of regs passed since 2010 or something, and there were 3 1/2 stacks almost 5' tall. Absurd, could probably get by less than a hundred pages.
I haven't followed the story too closely. From what I understand the guy is in clear violation of the law, but his case basically is : "So What? I'm not hurting anybody, so who cares?" Well, that coupled with some sort of ideological philosophy that does not recognize the authority of the US government. And he seems ready to take up arms against the government if need be....and it seems he has plenty of "militia" types ready to get his back.

You can have a thoughtful debate about the laws surrounding this case. And there is a defined due process that allows someone to challenge these rules. And he's had decades to do that very thing. But he hasn't. Instead he's just built himself a metaphorical apocalypse bunker with guns and an open threat to use them.

My opinon: He sounds like a total psycho ala David Koresh. If it comes to pass that he follows through on his attack against his own country he'll probably meet a similar fate to the aforementioned lunatic. And I'll cry about as hard for him as I did for the Wacko from Waco.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
I haven't followed the story too closely. From what I understand the guy is in clear violation of the law, but his case basically is : "So What? I'm not hurting anybody, so who cares?" Well, that coupled with some sort of ideological philosophy that does not recognize the authority of the US government. And he seems ready to take up arms against the government if need be....and it seems he has plenty of "militia" types ready to get his back.

You can have a thoughtful debate about the laws surrounding this case. And there is a defined due process that allows someone to challenge these rules. And he's had decades to do that very thing. But he hasn't. Instead he's just built himself a metaphorical apocalypse bunker with guns and an open threat to use them.

My opinon: He sounds like a total psycho ala David Koresh. If it comes to pass that he follows through on his attack against his own country he'll probably meet a similar fate to the aforementioned lunatic. And I'll cry about as hard for him as I did for the Wacko from Waco.


The governor of Nev. kinda disagrees with you.

"Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said Saturday, he was concerned for the safety of the public and government officials involved in the dispute, and he was glad the BLM yielded.

On April 8, Sandoval said the move by the BLM was "offensive" and called the land a "First Amendment Area."

"No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans," he said."


If you want to see commenting on this story, both pro and con, just visit the LVRJ website. Plenty of stories about the Bundy cattle roundup in the past 10 days......and everyone of them have a boatload of comments.

Quite the soap opera. Heavily armed government agents, contract cowboys from Utah, an endangered tortoise or two, heavily armed civilian militia, stubborn cattle ranchers, bony desert cattle, ect...ect...ect...

I haven't figured out who is wrong and who is right in the matter. What I would like to know.....don't cattle require water on a regular basis.....and where do the heck do they find said water in the desert ?
To call this guy a welfare cheat would be an insult to welfare cheats, because at least the other kind usually quit for a while when they get caught. And they don't resort to terroristic threats against federal officials.

He's stealing, from you and me, the grazing rights on federal land. It's settled law - the guy lost in federal court in 1998 and again in 2013, and if it's okay to flout federal courts rulings, then we're living in a country I don't recognize.

Theres lots of laws I disagree with...not the least of which is the vast array of voter suppression laws being implemented in several states, including mine. My agenda for protesting these laws includes: signing petitions, contacting politicians, attending civil protests, and voting for candidates that share my values. Something thats not on my agenda: threatening to open fire on the government body enforcing the laws I disagree with.

Nothing that has happened to this man warrants his militant attitude. Our country has had far more people oppressed to a much larger degree than this moron. MLK comes to immediate mind. There's a formula for making change in a Democracy. Shooting Federal agents is not part of it.


Do you disagree, Jatki? If this guy blows away a Federal agent for enforcing the law are you going to side with him?

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Theres lots of laws I disagree with...not the least of which is the vast array of voter suppression laws being implemented in several states, including mine. My agenda for protesting these laws includes: signing petitions, contacting politicians, attending civil protests, and voting for candidates that share my values. Something thats not on my agenda: threatening to open fire on the government body enforcing the laws I disagree with.

Nothing that has happened to this man warrants his militant attitude. Our country has had far more people oppressed to a much larger degree than this moron. MLK comes to immediate mind. There's a formula for making change in a Democracy. Shooting Federal agents is not part of it.


Nothing that has happened warrants a militant attitude?!? His family has owned and operated their ranch since the 1800's. BLM agents were taking their cattle. That rancher owns those animals. Those cows are their livelihood. The BLM had already corralled and loaded 400 head of the rancher's cattle. They would have taken more if it weren't for support from other Americans. God bless Cliven Bundy, his family and other Americans for standing up for what they believe before the federal government destroyed another family!

The BLM wanted to restrict the Bundy's cattle grazing starting in 1993 due to a desert turtle. Cows and turtles can live on the same ranch. This was an early EPA extremist environmental influence on land use. The turtles would be just fine without government restrictions on cattle ranchers in Nevada.

This entire ordeal has Harry Reid's stink all over it. The recently confirmed director of the BLM was a senior advisor to Reid from 2003 to 2011. Reid's son Rory is an attorney who represents a multi-billion dollar Chinese energy company that wants to build solar farms in southern Nevada (those large solar farms kill more natural habitat animals than any herd of cattle possibly could). That company needs land...government land that they can get real cheap....if only the BLM can force one stubborn rancher into bankruptcy by taking most of his herd. Rory Reid makes big bucks. A Chinese company gets another foot in the door toward owning America

People who threaten armed resistance to federal officers after losing in court are not patriots. Neither are those who defend them.




United States District Judge Lloyd D. George was nominatedby President Ronald Reagan on April 18, 1984
DonDiego has been busy preparing the DD Tomato Ranch for Spring planting, and hasn't been following this story.

So, has President Obama drawn a "red-line" yet? That's pretty much when one knows things are about to go down hill.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now