BLM backs down in Nevada Cattle roundup

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Man doesnt want to pay sales tax on soda....threatens store with gun

When the militia is done pointing guns at Feds in NV they should road trip to Chicago and gets this guy's back. Clearly he's being intimidated by Big Brother.


If he is in Chicago, he must be a Democrat!

Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Man doesnt want to pay sales tax on soda....threatens store with gun

When the militia is done pointing guns at Feds in NV they should road trip to Chicago and gets this guy's back. Clearly he's being intimidated by Big Brother.


If he is in Chicago, he must be a Democrat!


Probably a good bet. Take note of how left wing pundits and state officials are not calling for Civil War.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Shades of Saddam: The scumbags were "actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front" as human shields. YouTube video.

No wonder we have Baghdad BobOrme making up stories to defend them.






That's one brave former sheriff there.

Use women as cannon fodder, in order to score brownie points with the right wing nutjob crowd.
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Are conservatives saying that what we need here is an activist judge to ignore the law and do the "right" thing? Sure sounds like it to me.


I would suggest that the activism in the courtroom already happened...and it needs to be corrected.


I don't agree. If you want to use the Feds' lands to graze your cattle, you have to play by their rules. Else buy your own land and go private. You can't use public lands but make up your own rules. But again, I'm in New Jersey and don't understand all this BLM stuff. I'm just trying to apply common sense to the situation.

The BLM changed the rules 20 years ago. The Bundy ranch was there for many decades before the BLM even existed. They were paying for forage and water rights before the BLM changed the rules. It was an act of environmental extremism that brought about the changes. The federal government has been steadily taking away personal and public property rights from American citizens for the same extremist reasons. That will only continue as long as citizens allow it to happen. I hope the Bundy ranch encounter is just the beginning of a reversal of the government trampling on the rights of hard working Americans,

What none of the leftists in this thread realize is, Cliven Bundy was looking at losing his family ranch even if he had signed the contracts agreeing to pay the fees included in the changed grazing terms and conditions, and had paid those fees! The BLM decided 20 years ago that they were going to eliminate family ranches in that region of Nevada, and they did just that to dozens of other ranches...under the same false pretenses.

If Cliven Bundy's cattle were a herd of illegal immigrants, the current DOJ would have been at the fences waving them in, and possibly giving them automatic firearms. They'd be offered EBT cards, drivers licenses, cell phones, in-state college tuition and Medicaid. But, they are just cattle, so they are illegally trespassing on government property and their owner is scum for wanting to keep them where they are.
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Are conservatives saying that what we need here is an activist judge to ignore the law and do the "right" thing? Sure sounds like it to me.


I would suggest that the activism in the courtroom already happened...and it needs to be corrected.


I don't agree. If you want to use the Feds' lands to graze your cattle, you have to play by their rules. Else buy your own land and go private. You can't use public lands but make up your own rules. But again, I'm in New Jersey and don't understand all this BLM stuff. I'm just trying to apply common sense to the situation.

The BLM changed the rules 20 years ago...
So? Go out and win a goddamn presidential election and change the rules back again. You know, like a democracy. But when you defend those who make terrorist threats against federal employees, I'm ashamed America produced people like you.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Are conservatives saying that what we need here is an activist judge to ignore the law and do the "right" thing? Sure sounds like it to me.


I would suggest that the activism in the courtroom already happened...and it needs to be corrected.


I don't agree. If you want to use the Feds' lands to graze your cattle, you have to play by their rules. Else buy your own land and go private. You can't use public lands but make up your own rules. But again, I'm in New Jersey and don't understand all this BLM stuff. I'm just trying to apply common sense to the situation.

The BLM changed the rules 20 years ago...
So? Go out and win a goddamn presidential election and change the rules back again. You know, like a democracy. But when you defend those who make terrorist threats against federal employees, I'm ashamed America produced people like you.

First, nobody can vote for or against the BLM. Second, America is not a democracy where a majority rules over any minority....or maybe it is under Forkush rules. Third, the government rolled into the Bundy ranch heavily armed to rustle cattle from one Nevada family, and American citizens reacted. Who are the terrorists? Fourth, my American ancestry is colonial. My great great great (not sure how many greats) grandfather arrived in this land in the early 1600's and founded the state of Rhode Island. You are ashamed America produced people like me? People who stand up for the rights that MY ancestors recognized in opposition to tyranny?!?

You, Forkush, can continue to support tyranny under the guise of an election. Good on ya for that! Keep voting for them until they take away rights you thought you had! You'll be wondering what the heck happened without realizing that you were what the heck happened.


Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Are conservatives saying that what we need here is an activist judge to ignore the law and do the "right" thing? Sure sounds like it to me.


I would suggest that the activism in the courtroom already happened...and it needs to be corrected.


I don't agree. If you want to use the Feds' lands to graze your cattle, you have to play by their rules. Else buy your own land and go private. You can't use public lands but make up your own rules. But again, I'm in New Jersey and don't understand all this BLM stuff. I'm just trying to apply common sense to the situation.

The BLM changed the rules 20 years ago...
So? Go out and win a goddamn presidential election and change the rules back again. You know, like a democracy. But when you defend those who make terrorist threats against federal employees, I'm ashamed America produced people like you.

First, nobody can vote for or against the BLM. Second, America is not a democracy where a majority rules over any minority...
Apparently you prefer bullets over ballots.

The president appoints the Secretary of the Interior, who appoints the head of the BLM - it's that simple. And quite literally, the judge of whether minority constitutional rights are being trampled upon is our federal judiciary system. And a federal judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, says Bundy is a thief.

So go out and win a presidential election if you want to change things. Until then, the moment you support threatening federal employees with murder, you are un-American and evil. Please, make my day and tell me there are no young people who look to you for moral guidance.
I don't care how long this bozo or his family has been doing this, if he is unable to play by the rules and pay his way like the rest of us, I consider him to be a nothing more than a thief stealing my money. Frankly they had every right to take the cattle and quite frankly should have and with every means necessary. Whether it ends like Waco is entirely up to the genius you have just emboldened with your foolish arguements.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now