Breaking news - two bombs go off at Boston Marathon finish. At least two dead

Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
The Saudi suspect wasn't arrested. He was shipped out of the country, deported because....well, I'll let y'all figure that out.
Show of hands. How many people think Bob Orme is being truthful? And if it turns out that the Saudi "suspect" is actually still in the US, how many think that Bob Orme will admit he was wrong?


There is report that the Saudi who may be connected to a powerful Saudi family will be sent home next week. There is also a report that the Saudi foreign minister had an unscheduled meeting with obama yesterday.

So Bob Orme is telling the truth as he was just posting a news story
Truth never needs such a tortured explanation.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.


There you go again. When caught red handed you put words in peoples mouths and completely distort what was said. The fact is you brought your gutter politics once again to a tragedy. You don't seem to be able to comment on other news organizations having screwed up facts of the story. Do you care to comment on that, or do we get more of your circle jerk tactics?

I have been reading the comments here about this latest appalling atrocity. I also would like to know who is responsible and why they did the bombing. The minute by minute posting and dissecting of comments I find of little value and the negative critiquing of some of the responses are just downright annoying. This event will play out and, hopefully, the monster(s) who committed this horrendous act will be properly prosecuted. Meanwhile, can't you nit pickers just grow up stop with your inane comments?
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.


There you go again. When caught red handed you put words in peoples mouths and completely distort what was said. The fact is you brought your gutter politics once again to a tragedy. You don't seem to be able to comment on other news organizations having screwed up facts of the story. Do you care to comment on that, or do we get more of your circle jerk tactics?
So according to your reasoning, since I have failed to post on the subject of YOUR choice, I'm engaging in "gutter politics" and "circle jerk tactics?"

But Roulette Man, you have failed to comment on Bob Orme's claim of deportation. So according to my reasoning you are deciding not to post on the subject of MY choice.

See Roulette Man, there's the difference between you and me. And I really like that difference.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.


There you go again. When caught red handed you put words in peoples mouths and completely distort what was said. The fact is you brought your gutter politics once again to a tragedy. You don't seem to be able to comment on other news organizations having screwed up facts of the story. Do you care to comment on that, or do we get more of your circle jerk tactics?
So according to your reasoning, since I have failed to post on the subject of YOUR choice, I'm engaging in "gutter politics" and "circle jerk tactics?"

But Roulette Man, you have failed to comment on Bob Orme's claim of deportation. So according to my reasoning you are deciding not to post on the subject of MY choice.

See Roulette Man, there's the difference between you and me. And I really like that difference.


No your gutter politics is in lieu of this tragedy, you choose to make it political because of the reporting entity. Obviously you are not intelligent to see that everybody sees through your little shallow act. You won't answer, which means once again you've been exposed for your hypocrisy and shallowness.
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.


There you go again. When caught red handed you put words in peoples mouths and completely distort what was said. The fact is you brought your gutter politics once again to a tragedy. You don't seem to be able to comment on other news organizations having screwed up facts of the story. Do you care to comment on that, or do we get more of your circle jerk tactics?
So according to your reasoning, since I have failed to post on the subject of YOUR choice, I'm engaging in "gutter politics" and "circle jerk tactics?"

But Roulette Man, you have failed to comment on Bob Orme's claim of deportation. So according to my reasoning you are deciding not to post on the subject of MY choice.

See Roulette Man, there's the difference between you and me. And I really like that difference.


No your gutter politics is in lieu of this tragedy, you choose to make it political because of the reporting entity. Obviously you are not intelligent to see that everybody sees through your little shallow act. You won't answer, which means once again you've been exposed for your hypocrisy and shallowness.
Well I could have responded before, but I wanted you to dig in a little deeper. Three days ago I criticized NBC for even speculating on a "suspect." And two days ago I posted that the NY Post was simply "more wrong" than other news organizations.

But there's good news Roulette Man. While "shallow act" didn't make the cut, "circle jerk tactics" and "gutter politics" did, and are now part of your permanent record.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Actually that picture Don Diego posted matches the description I'm reading in other stories. If so, I don't know how the Post got their hands on it. Does anybody notice how Forkie can't answer and remains silent on other news organizations screwing things up in this story?
So you're saying that since I last commented on the NY Post's 12-dead-suspect-in-custody story TWO DAYS AGO, I am now required to maintain a meta-analysis of all news coverage on the subject since that time?

You people have such strange rules.


There you go again. When caught red handed you put words in peoples mouths and completely distort what was said. The fact is you brought your gutter politics once again to a tragedy. You don't seem to be able to comment on other news organizations having screwed up facts of the story. Do you care to comment on that, or do we get more of your circle jerk tactics?
So according to your reasoning, since I have failed to post on the subject of YOUR choice, I'm engaging in "gutter politics" and "circle jerk tactics?"

But Roulette Man, you have failed to comment on Bob Orme's claim of deportation. So according to my reasoning you are deciding not to post on the subject of MY choice.

See Roulette Man, there's the difference between you and me. And I really like that difference.


No your gutter politics is in lieu of this tragedy, you choose to make it political because of the reporting entity. Obviously you are not intelligent to see that everybody sees through your little shallow act. You won't answer, which means once again you've been exposed for your hypocrisy and shallowness.
Well I could have responded before, but I wanted you to dig in a little deeper. Three days ago I criticized NBC for even speculating on a "suspect." And two days ago I posted that the NY Post was simply "more wrong" than other news organizations.

But there's good news Roulette Man. While "shallow act" didn't make the cut, "circle jerk tactics" and "gutter politics" did, and are now part of your permanent record.


I'm just trying to figure out if you are naive and don't think people can easily see your tactics or are you not smart enough? Did you cut and paste the links for your library?
Oh no, not the permanent record.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now