Quote
Originally posted by: ChilcootQuote
Originally posted by: tonyrob
Add to smokers - women who wear so much perfume/deodorant that they are detectable at 50 yards.
Not the least bit comparable. Fragrances don't cause cancera in others nearby. Second-hand smoke does. That's kind of a big difference.
Quote
Originally posted by: tonyrob
And people who don't bathe.
Also nothing like second-hand smoke. Stinky non-bathers don't cause cancers in others nearby. Again, a big difference.
We shouldn't confuse annoyances and surreptitious poisoning.
Chilcoot, below I've included all of tonyrob's post. I don't see where he was saying too much perfume or non bathing was worse than smoking. He just stated he didn't like them and was adding them to his dislkes. He wasn't rating them for their probabilty to cause cancer. You've made this assumption.
Quote
Originally posted by: tonyrob
Add to smokers - women who wear so much perfume/deodorant that they are detectable at 50 yards. And people who don't bathe. For me the killer in casinos is cigar/pipe smoke. |I had to leave MGM last night - I really could not breathe - which may be a result of my previously being a heavy smoker - quit 20 years ago but still suffer from 2nd hand smoke. Aquarius in Laughlin and MSS in Vegas are the 2 places where I can spend the evening without having to go outside.
