Quote
Originally posted by: anthony
Good catch. There's a clue in itself. We don't send out notices with misused words like that except for rare mistakes that get immediately corrected. I don't know what happened, but that's not a message that we have programmed anywhere. We'll see if we can track it down. There was never any barring.
Originally posted by: anthony
Quote
Originally posted by: KarenTN
did the mesage actually say "more then 10"
Good catch. There's a clue in itself. We don't send out notices with misused words like that except for rare mistakes that get immediately corrected. I don't know what happened, but that's not a message that we have programmed anywhere. We'll see if we can track it down. There was never any barring.
Yes that is the exact message.
Note: DonDiego did not copy this message on 11 August. He did not remember the exact message today. But today when anthony stated there was no banning and before he attempted to post, DonDiego first tried to send a private message. And the "banning message" appeared, so he copied it.
The message comprised three lines of black letters on a grey background. The word Reason: was boldface centered on the second line of the message.
"than" was misspelled.
There was no period after the second sentence.
DonDiego thought the word "his" was suspicious if it was, in fact, a standard banning message.
DonDiego thanks all those who declared their support for teechur and him. And he also thanks those who professed their support for DonDiego's Being banned, as they sincerely believe he has violated Forum rules.
As DonDiego's uncle used to say: "Wouldn't it be dull if everyone was a trombone player?"
DonDiego would like to debate whatever comes up in this forum with civility and respect, . . . but, in any case, . . . "cain't we all jes' git along together":
