Goodbye, adieu, adios, cheerio, ciao, toodle-oo….our swan song

Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes
We seem to have lost the biggest issue here. Was LVA hacked? Who banned DD? Is there a conspiracy against residents of WV? Inquiring minds want to know.


Perhaps it was practical joke DD played on Teechur. Ha, she was punked!
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Sigh. I guess Forkush is as innocent as a lamb. I wonder why he ever got banned and then broke the rules and came back under another name?
Didn't get banned. When my paid membership ran out in 4/11, my id stopped working. The quickest way to deal with it was just to create another id. Ask ac, he's around here somewhere. And I'll just wait here for your apology, okay?

Now back to DonDiego. Hey DD, when someone refers to you as a buttwipe, or claims you have a no life or a sad life, is the word "ad hominem" too strong a response. I'm still waiting for your guidance on this!


Then why in the world did you deny you were forky upon your return as arsenine?


And, this new name situation also happened to Maliber around the same time.
Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Didn't get banned. When my paid membership ran out in 4/11, my id stopped working. The quickest way to deal with it was just to create another id.

DonDiego finds himself in the awkward position of supporting arshaleign’s [AKA forkush’s] position.

Several years ago when DonDiego’s paid membership ran out the ID “DonDiego” quit working in the free Fora. DonDiego communicated to odysseus that he’d like to have his “DonDiego” nom de plume restored, and odysseus did restore it.
As DonDiego recalls arshaleign [AKA forkush] explained in this Forum a few months ago that he’d chosen to just create a new ID.

[The only reason DonDiego keeps referring to arshaleign as “arshaleign [AKA forkush ]” is because he believes it irritates him. DonDiego’s desire to irritate is one of many character flaws with which he is burdened. teechur can confirm this.]

Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Now back to DonDiego. Hey DD, when someone refers to you as a buttwipe, or claims you have a no life or a sad life, is the word "ad hominem" too strong a response. I'm still waiting for your guidance on this!

”ad hominem” would seem an appropriate description with reference to the claims of one having no life or a sad life; however, being a “buttwipe” might actually be pertinent to the argument. DonDiego would require specific details to decide.
From Urban Dictionary: 2. buttwipe In other words: a jerk, asshole, jackass, or more importantly, "asswipe".
Usage: "Only pussy-whipped bastards that have no balls use 'buttwipe' ."

Nonetheless, why does arshaleign [AKA forkush] believe it necessary to characterize his opponent's argument as “ad hominem” or “fallacious” or “far-fetched” or anything else. Advancement of the discussion/debate is not well served by describing the nature of one’s opponent’s argument; why not just address/refute the argument itself?

[Oh, . . . and DonDiego’s reference to “quarrelsome and disagreeable” folks was not aimed exclusively at arshaleigh [AKA forkush]. DonDiego was merely echoing arshaleign’s [AKA forkush’s] opinion voiced earlier: “Perhaps some of the nastiness [around] here should be deleted.”]
When responses were made to various arshaleign posts that called him "Forkush" and not "arshaleign" he didn't answer them even though he answered other posts on the same thread. It looked like he did not want to reply to the thread because he would then be admitting he was Forkush.

I still find it hard to believe that if your subscription has expired to the paid section, then you should not have access to that section but should be able to still access the free section.

If this is what truly happened, arshaleign should never have hesitated to responding to the name of Forkush.


I specifically remember forky denying that he was indeed himself(insert twilight zone music now) when arsealine come online. But I don't really care, everybody knows forkys' true colors so whatever.

But tis true, there are much ,ore important things going on here. Who indeed hacked DDs' account and why? Is part of a much bigger plot to totally hack the entire LVA? Did DD really win those ribbons?or did he pike then from Miss Johnson and aunt Bee? So many questions, very few answers.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
I specifically remember forky denying that he was indeed himself(insert twilight zone music now) when arsealine come online. But I don't really care, everybody knows forkys' true colors so whatever.

But tis true, there are much ,ore important things going on here. Who indeed hacked DDs' account and why? Is part of a much bigger plot to totally hack the entire LVA? Did DD really win those ribbons?or did he pike then from Miss Johnson and aunt Bee? So many questions, very few answers.


I think someone was jealous of his tomatoes. On the other hand maybe they didn't like the Eagles or Cardinals.
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
...I still find it hard to believe that if your subscription has expired to the paid section, then you should not have access to that section but should be able to still access the free section...
Your "proof" that I changed my name because I was banned has just been debunked by DonDiego. That you aren't apologizing at this point is just....remarkable.

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Didn't get banned. When my paid membership ran out in 4/11, my id stopped working. The quickest way to deal with it was just to create another id.

DonDiego finds himself in the awkward position of supporting arshaleign’s [AKA forkush’s] position.

Several years ago when DonDiego’s paid membership ran out the ID “DonDiego” quit working in the free Fora. DonDiego communicated to odysseus that he’d like to have his “DonDiego” nom de plume restored, and odysseus did restore it.
As DonDiego recalls arshaleign [AKA forkush] explained in this Forum a few months ago that he’d chosen to just create a new ID.

[The only reason DonDiego keeps referring to arshaleign as “arshaleign [AKA forkush ]” is because he believes it irritates him. DonDiego’s desire to irritate is one of many character flaws with which he is burdened. teechur can confirm this.]

Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Now back to DonDiego. Hey DD, when someone refers to you as a buttwipe, or claims you have a no life or a sad life, is the word "ad hominem" too strong a response. I'm still waiting for your guidance on this!

”ad hominem” would seem an appropriate description with reference to the claims of one having no life or a sad life; however, being a “buttwipe” might actually be pertinent to the argument. DonDiego would require specific details to decide.
From Urban Dictionary: 2. buttwipe In other words: a jerk, asshole, jackass, or more importantly, "asswipe".
Usage: "Only pussy-whipped bastards that have no balls use 'buttwipe' ."

Nonetheless, why does arshaleign [AKA forkush] believe it necessary to characterize his opponent's argument as “ad hominem” or “fallacious” or “far-fetched” or anything else. Advancement of the discussion/debate is not well served by describing the nature of one’s opponent’s argument; why not just address/refute the argument itself?

[Oh, . . . and DonDiego’s reference to “quarrelsome and disagreeable” folks was not aimed exclusively at arshaleigh [AKA forkush]. DonDiego was merely echoing arshaleign’s [AKA forkush’s] opinion voiced earlier: “Perhaps some of the nastiness [around] here should be deleted.”]


I was looking forward to calling Don DIego by an (AKA) name upon his return. I had this whole thread planned out where I was going to reference Arshaleign (aka Forkush) and NewDonDIego (aka Don DIego). And now thats all in the toilet.

Damn you, LVA hall monitors!
As Monty Python would say - this thread is getting extremely silly - cut to picture of bare-assed piano player, followed by large foot stomping on Don Diego
Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
...I still find it hard to believe that if your subscription has expired to the paid section, then you should not have access to that section but should be able to still access the free section...
Your "proof" that I changed my name because I was banned has just been debunked by DonDiego. That you aren't apologizing at this point is just....remarkable.


If it smells like a rotten tomato, and it looks like a rotten tomato, and it feels like a rotten tomato, then guess what?

You are not a very good liar.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now