How convenient

How completely surprising, the IRS has lost of all Lois Lerners E-mails from '09-'11 concerning the extra attention given to conservative groups.

"The IRS told investigators in a letter Friday that it was unable to produce many of Lerner's emails from January 2009 to April 2011 because her computer "crashed" in mid-2011. It said it was able to recover thousands of other messages from the computers of other IRS workers who'd been copied on those emails...

Isn't it convenient for the Obama administration that the IRS now says it has suddenly realized it lost Lois Lerner's emails requested by Congress and promised by [IRS] Commissioner John Koskinen? "
They TARGETED conservative groups!!!!!

Oh wait...


Flashback thread?

Are we ready for another bad ACA website thread?

Bigfoot?

Vince Foster?

FDR knew about Pearl Harbor?

Bush did 9-11?

This place is like a bad archive for nut jobs. That's not an insult, I enjoy the sheer goofiness and nostalgia.


moar please

Whoops, just noticed I forgot the link.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/irs-says-it-lost-lois-lerner-emails-tea-party-probe-n131101

Forky I swear you are the poster child for Snidely's tag line, you are going to believe whatever you want to belive. The facts are overwhelming in the case and I know that taking the fifth doesn't automatically equate guilt,but it sure as hell doesn't look give much merit to the denial in the case. From the article itself...

"Lerner was placed on administrative leave from her position as head of the agency's section on tax-exempt organizations in May 2013, after she admitted that the IRS gave special attention to applications for tax-exempt status that included words like "Tea Party" and "patriot." She retired in September. "

Another thing I'm noticing more and more, the extreme lefties have resorted to thinking that insults, belittling and name calling somehow give more credence to their arguments. Kinda cute really.

There is absolutely no reason for anyone to get his (or her, as the case may be) panties in a wad over this matter.

DonDiego is pleased to be able to assure every citizen who may be concerned about this matter that everything will be OK.
Section 3 the IRS Organization Manual addresses standards for using e-mail.

******quote***

1.10.3.2.3 (07-08-2011)
Emails as Possible Federal Records

All federal employees and federal contractors are required by law to preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency. Records must be properly stored and preserved, available for retrieval and subject to appropriate approved disposition schedules.

The Federal Records Act applies to email records just as it does to records you create using other media. Emails are records when they are:
Created or received in the transaction of agency business
Appropriate for preservation as evidence of the government’s function and activities, or
Valuable because of the information they contain


If you create or receive email messages during the course of your daily work, you are responsible for ensuring that you manage them properly. The Treasury Department’s current email policy requires emails and attachments that meet the definition of a federal record be added to the organization’s files by printing them (including the essential transmission data) and filing them with related paper records. If transmission and receipt data are not printed by the email system, annotate the paper copy. More information on IRS records management requirements is available at https://erc.web.irs.gov/Displayanswers/Question.asp?FolderID=4&CategoryID=5 or see the Records Management Handbook, IRM 1.15.1 https://publish.no.irs.gov/IRM/P01/PDF/31421A03.PDF).

An email determined to be a federal record may eventually be considered as having historical value by the National Archivist prior to disposal. Therefore, ensure that all your communications are professional in tone.

Please note that maintaining a copy of an email or its attachments within the IRS email MS Outlook application does not meet the requirements of maintaining an official record. Therefore, print and file email and its attachments if they are either permanent records or if they relate to a specific case.

***endquote***
[boldface added - DD]

So DonDiego is certain that Mrs. Lerner created a printed copy of her e-mails in accordance with the Treasury Department Rules and that she will produce them when Congress requests her to do so.

DonDiego is confident that the printed record will exonerate Mrs. Lerner of any ill-intent or misbehavior regarding targeting of 501(c) tax exemption applications for political purposes. And in the unlikely event that poor old DonDiego's confidence is misplaced, . . . DonDiego is certain that Attorney General Eric Holder will begin an immediate investigation to uncover the truth in accordance with the wishes of the President of the United States Barack Obama. DonDiego is certain that no untoward behavior will be uncovered in such an investigation.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Forky I swear you are the poster child for Snidely's tag line, you are going to believe whatever you want to belive...
Really?





104 conservative groups were targeted and were asked an average of almost 15 questions. Less than half were approved. 7 liberal groups were targeted and asked less than 5 questions. All 7 groups were approved.

Lerner pleads the 5th and then mysteriously got lost.

Anybody see a trend.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
104 conservative groups were targeted and were asked an average of almost 15 questions. Less than half were approved. 7 liberal groups were targeted and asked less than 5 questions. All 7 groups were approved.

Lerner pleads the 5th and then mysteriously got lost.

Anybody see a trend.


and this is the "clowns" that are going to run Obamacare program! Damn I certainly can sleep well tonight knowing this.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
104 conservative groups were targeted and were asked an average of almost 15 questions. Less than half were approved. 7 liberal groups were targeted and asked less than 5 questions. All 7 groups were approved...
Not true - hoops source is Republican Congressman Dave Camp. Everyone who believes that is a fair handed source please raise your hand - and your IQ.

Seven organizations with the word "progressive" in their name were targeted. But Camp's bullshit report ignored:

  • Liberal organizations that advocated for medical marijuana who were TARGETED.
  • Liberal organizations that advocated for Obamacare who were TARGETED.
  • Liberal organizations that for Palestinian rights who were TARGETED.
  • Liberal organizations that included "Occupy"in their names who were TARGETED.
    ...and so on.

    Also, Camp's fantasy report makes no mention of how many conservative organizations applied for tax exemption, versus how many organizations exclusively with the word "progressive" in their name applied. Do you think maybe in 2010, at the ascendancy of the Tea Party, their might have been a few more of them?

    Of course ALL of them, liberal and conservative, should be targeted. Partisan political organizations should not get tax exemption under our laws.
  • Forkush5...approved not approved.....stick to the f...ing facts, jeez.
    Already a LVA subscriber?
    To continue reading, choose an option below:
    Diamond Membership
    $3 per month
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Limited Member Rewards Online
    Join Now
    or
    Platinum Membership
    $50 per year
    Unlimited access to LVA website
    Exclusive subscriber-only content
    Exclusive Member Rewards Book
    Join Now