Last Thoughts [Not Vegas Related]


Another thread ruined !
Maybe this can help salvage things....



By far not the best shot, but best I could do off hand.
Quote

Originally posted by: clarkvegas
Quote

Originally posted by: Tutontow

If Lurkerposter was hear when political post were banned he would know you could hear the crickets back then because it was so dead.


Because all the people who would normally post about non-political stuff left the board because of the political stuff.

They also are never coming back. So when there are no political posts, they don't even realize it because they don't come here anymore.

I don't know why this is so hard to grasp.

You mentioned you were one of those people, sooo..that's begs the question, why the hell are you here other than to bitch? There's other non-pol. threads going on and I don't see you posting in a single one of them
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Another thread ruined !


It was ruined the moment you started it, obviously calling out for your support group (not vegas related). But anyhow, that's fine. I think it's interesting to see certain regular posters at LVA don't seem to feel the need to talk about Vegas having been there multiple times while at the vegasmessageboard people don't seem to have that same problem (even after visiting Vegas 20+ times). So that's why I mainly lurk here and post there.

Polital threads get a large amount of responses. Vegas related items not so much (or the reponses become off-topic within 10 posts). It's just annoying to go true all the useless shit around here to find a few useful topics. But that seems to be accepted daily policy around here so people don't be offended if I post potential useless shit in the eyes of some.




Actually, DonDiego added the "[Not Vegas Related]" to warn those who prefer not to read not-Vegas-related-posts. Apparently it did not act as a sufficient deterrent.

DonDiego posted the gif, because he found it amusing. That's all. And, as threads sometimes do, it stimulated some conversation about a current motion picture. DonDiego enjoys seeing a pleasant thread diverge topic-to-topic as different posters interpret things.

Nonetheless, DonDiego isn't bothered that LurkerPoster misjudged his motive. There's lots of folks on the internets who misread others' motives. DonDiego finds it difficult enough to just address whatever's been written; he doesn't try to read any motive into it.

In fact, DonDiego isn't bothered by much on the internets.
Some folks really, really like to post their political, even partisan political, views. If that's what they enjoy, far be it from DonDiego to deny them their pleasure. The owner of the website is the only fellow who's opinion should matter. DonDiego would communicate his dissatisfaction about the website to him, if he harbored any dissatisfaction, . . . which he doesn't.
On only two occasions has DonDiego communicated his objection to a post to the moderator. Both times were the same poster who: i. initiated the topic of assassination of then President G. W. Bush and ii. later initiated a thread addressing blowing people up in Las Vegas. (Maybe he had anger issues.) Anyway DonDiego communicated that he opined such posts might represent a danger to the reputation of the website. They were deleted.

Actually, as he typed "[Not Vegas Related]" in the original topic, he recalled when posts would regularly have a parenthetical tag attached, . . . like (POL) to designate it was, in fact, political. Maybe a return to those days would soothe those who object to particular topics. (DonDiego didn't really care for such parenthetical designations, because sometimes he just wanted to discuss "current events", . . . but readers would read political intentions where none were intended, . . . and sometimes turn the thread into a political one. But at least really intentional political posts could be identified by the initiator.)

Oh, and DonDiego won't be offended if LurkerPoster posts "potential, . . . (or actual), . . . useless shit". That's what the internets are for. It's not like there's somebody storing everything anybody types into a humongous data base in Utah, . . . or anything.

Quote

Oh, and DonDiego won't be offended if LurkerPoster posts "potential, . . . (or actual), . . . useless shit". That's what the internets are for. It's not like there's somebody storing everything anybody types into a humongous data base in Utah, . . . or anything.


Actually, I have to compliment DonDiego for the comment above. This is the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Cheers

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego

Oh, and DonDiego won't be offended if LurkerPoster posts "potential, . . . (or actual), . . . useless shit". That's what the internets are for. It's not like there's somebody storing everything anybody types into a humongous data base in Utah, . . . or anything.



Utah? Why did you have to pick Utah? I can think of better states to store internet shit - like... maybe.... Montana. It's certainly large enough.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now