Given O'Keefe's past here is how his videos work: he shoots a large amount of video and then selectively edits it to make it say what he wants. For example if a TV reporter were to interview Don Diego and ask him a series of question like:
Question one: Do you like your Tomato patch? To which you reply: It is my favorite thing in the whole world.
Question two: Do you like Obamacare? To which you reply: I hate it and think it sucks.
A few hours later you see a teaser for the news: Local Tomato Rancher Don Diego professes his love for Obamacare. When you watch the video they have cut and paste it to give your first repose to the second question. When you complain they say what in the video is false?
Question one: Do you like your Tomato patch? To which you reply: It is my favorite thing in the whole world.
Question two: Do you like Obamacare? To which you reply: I hate it and think it sucks.
A few hours later you see a teaser for the news: Local Tomato Rancher Don Diego professes his love for Obamacare. When you watch the video they have cut and paste it to give your first repose to the second question. When you complain they say what in the video is false?
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
DonDiego asks malibber2 the same questions he asked Chilcoot:
What in the story linked is incorrect?
What in the video is false?
n.b. Chilcoot already replied that he knows nothing incorrect or false:
Originally posted by: DonDiego
QuoteThis is not about poor old DonDiego.
Originally posted by: malibber2
So do you normally find the advice of recently convicted criminals and people on the losing end of recent defamation lawsuits (based upon their prior political videos) as credible trustworthy people?
DonDiego asks malibber2 the same questions he asked Chilcoot:
What in the story linked is incorrect?
What in the video is false?
n.b. Chilcoot already replied that he knows nothing incorrect or false:
Quote
Originally posted by: Chilcoot
We don't know yet.
