Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
This week Marcis & chilly seem to have an odd obsession with my toolbox.
Not sure what you mean, the only two tools you have are these.
For instance:
And this:
Originally posted by: hoops2
This week Marcis & chilly seem to have an odd obsession with my toolbox.
Not sure what you mean, the only two tools you have are these.
For instance:
Quote
Originally posted by: ChilcootQuote
Originally posted by: hoops2
This ruling hinges on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was passed in 1993 to redress an earlier court ruling against Native Americans who’d used the hallucinogen peyote as part of a religious ceremony.
Ironically, that Supreme Court ruling was written by Justice Antonin Scalia, while the RFRA passed in response was supported by Sen. Harry Reid and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
The law’s purpose was to give broader protections to religious freedom.
If the government wants to impose a rule that substantially burdens an American’s free exercise of religion, the law says, it not only has to have a compelling interest, it has to use the least-restrictive means possible.
By contrast, the president seems to make a habit of forcing people to pay for his preferences.
In this case, he threatened to crush anyone who objected with huge fines — running to $475 million a year for Hobby Lobby alone. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito observed that if these fines “do not amount to a substantial burden, it’s hard to see what would.”
Yet again, hoops2 cuts and pastes from a copyrighted article and pretends he was the one who wrote its properly-spelled, grammatically-correct words.
This time he's just copying an editorial from today's New York Post, one of the mouths on Rupert Murdoch's right wing noise machine.
Why should hoops2 think for himself when Rupert Murdoch will do it for him?
And this:
Quote
Originally posted by: ChilcootQuote
Originally posted by: hoops2
The Obama administration is struggling to resolve data discrepancies that could jeopardize coverage for millions who sought health insurance on the federal exchange HealthCare.gov, according to a watchdog report on the still-rocky implementation of ObamaCare.
Though the system's troubles have faded from the headlines since the problem-plagued launch last October, a report from the health department inspector general provided the first independent look at widespread issues the government is having effectively fact-checking the information applicants are putting in the system.
According to the report, the administration was unable to resolve 2.6 million so-called "inconsistencies" out of a total of 2.9 million such problems from October through December 2013.
The government needs to determine applicants' eligibility in order to verify they can enroll and, in some cases, get government subsidies. Without that step, coverage could be jeopardized. Critics fear these issues also could cause chaos during the 2015 tax-filing season, as many would have to pay back subsidy money they were not entitled to.
According to the report, those running the federal marketplace are having trouble resolving problems "even if applicants submitted appropriate documentation."
"The federal marketplace was generally incapable of resolving most inconsistencies," the report said, claiming the government could not resolve 89 percent of the problems
Yet another example of hoops2 just cutting and pasting properly-spelled, grammatically-correct words from Rupert Murdoch's right-wing noise machine and pretending he wrote them himself.
This time its a Fox News story he stole word for word and is pretending he wrote. I know, shocking, right?
Hey hoops2, I found an avatar for you:
Your toolbox barely contains the school supplies of a gifted preschooler
