House Republicans BRING THE RECEIPTS To Prove Hunter Biden's Tax Crimes

There are a number of witnesses that are saying Garland had both his hands on the scale. There is also a lot of evidence that hunter was the conduit to joe.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/06/22/hunter-biden-whistleblower-destroys-garland-cover-up-efforts/

 

This was a text from yesterday showing that hunter & joe were in communication with the Chinese communists.

 

"I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight" Biden wrote.

 

"And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction." "I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father," Biden said.

That's huge, Tom !  

 

You're suggesting that  when Joe Biden was a civilian he allegedly had a phone call with his son.   Well not exactly.    if we believe Rupert Murdoch's credible source (insert laugh line here)  Hunter was waiting for  a call from his civilian father.      

 

Thats Tom's big slam dunk.

 

And this is where Tom will follow up by asking a question instead of giving an answer.    Proceed.

 

There is a lot of rvidence going back to when he was vp that hunter was the conduit to his father. There are over 100 SAR reports & several companies whose only existence was to move money around to the Biden family. There was Biden having the Ukrainian AG fired when he was investigating burisma & hunter. 

The evidence is there for a real justice dept & IRS to investigate & for the liberals to see if they take their heads out of the sand. 

Meanwhile the repugs heads are up tRump's ass when it comes to his crime family money-making schemes when he was *president and after when he stole top secret documents.


Originally posted by: tom

There is a lot of rvidence going back to when he was vp that hunter was the conduit to his father. There are over 100 SAR reports & several companies whose only existence was to move money around to the Biden family. There was Biden having the Ukrainian AG fired when he was investigating burisma & hunter. 

The evidence is there for a real justice dept & IRS to investigate & for the liberals to see if they take their heads out of the sand. 


WHoa  - that was fast!   As soon as I kicked the no-substance bullsit  of Tom's article he backtracked to some other evidence he cant articulate.

 

The Hunter Biden investigation started in year 2 of Trump's presidency....which gave him a full three years of " a real justice department"   and  a "real IRS"....and all that amounted to was Bengazhi Tom having an anxiety attack and no substance.

 

Poor Tom.    Conservatives want so desperately for Democrats to be as sleazy as the sumbags they vote for.  But  the evidence never seems to materialize beyond the pages of Glenn Beck and Alex Jones. 

 

 

If Tom admitted to himself that he's been supporting a party of crooks and sleazebags, his already pitifully low self-esteem would take another hit---so instead, he bleats about Biden. Twenty times a day.

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

Tell me why I'm suppossed to give a shit about civilian Hunter Biden.       

 

The crux of the ongoing conservative outcry was that his father (a sitting US government employee) was somehow involved with corruption regarding Hunter's activities.   And  we'll just ignore the known quantity that these same critics completely embrace the proven pocket-lining corruption engaged by the disgraced ex-president who is already indicited for  that activity among other sleazy behavior

 

What decade is it going to be when the Bengazhi sleuths uncover Joe Biden's great financial grift of the US people?    


Doesn't matter if you give a shit or not..to me anyway. We'll just placidly disagree that the DOJ and FBI are indeed biased in favor of HB . The greater implication is, which you don't give a shit about either, is Joe Biden's activities. That story is still out.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Gordian knot cut: we don't have access to all the information/evidence/data in such a case, and unless we want to simply yeep that any outcome unfavorable to "our side" is ipso facto proof of heinous bias, we accept that outcome. For instance, there may be what you (inaccurately) call "whistleblower testimonies," but does reading the (redacted? complete?) transcripts give you any info on how thoroughly that testimony was vetted and how credible the testator was found to be?

 

You see, Charles...you're not doing that at all. You claim "evidence of bias," but that so-called evidence is nothing more than an outcome you didn't like. What's your ACTUAL evidence of such bias? Because the decision itself that was reached won't cut it. It can't.

 

So I don't want to be the guy in the nosebleed seats screaming at the referee because I think he blew the call--from my vantage point 75 yards away. I'd be really proud of you if you'd admit that that's what you're doing. Bias isn't "decided the way I didn't want." And since bias is a human emotion--exactly how would you intend to show it existed in the hearts and minds of those who made the decision?

 

Be painfully honest, Charles. You don't have to be a Republican all the time!


I'm being painfully honest..from what I see from several sources regarding this DOJ / FBI bias issue. The thing is, you can't / won't change my view of it; you don't get to make my decisions / choices (you're completely powerless in that area). I'm more concerned about the sweep-aways and mindset of those agencies than I am about whatever degree of punishment HB received. It's not so much about HB..it's about bias, and the possible implications as these issues  relate to Joe Biden's activities. That's the rock in my boot.

 

Did you read the testimonies of the whistleblowers? Think they're just another conservative conspiracy theory mongers, too?

 

I'm givin up on you liberals..well, for a few days anyway. I'll reannoy you folks next week..*l*.

 

Adios

Originally posted by: Charles Higgins

HB took a plea deal ..that's that. Have the resident liberals here looked at / read the recently released IRS transcripts of the whistleblower testimonies related to  HB's IRS tax case? Consider it..maybe even do it..you know just for fair fun? Then you can all run back in here and discount a considerable degree of evidence for/of a biased DOJ ( including AG Garland, amongst a host of others) in this case and some at least partial truths. Then you can refer to all these testimonies as comic cartoons, etc...and re-lambast the oversight committee and all the sorry-assed Republicans.

 

No links..look it up yourselves. *l* Googlegoober it "IRS whistleblowers transcripts of Hunter Biden tax case". Find the actual PDF of the IRS transcripts, rather than an opinion piece ( just a strong suggestion).

 

Particularly, I'd be interested in what Mark has to say regarding the veracity of these testimonies and whether any bias occurred or not..because he's at times pretty reasonable ( despite the reality that I'm miles apart from him on most political issues). Plus, he apparently has legal training / background...maybe some merit there.


Our resident Liberals only read Liberal opinion pieces.

Our resident tRumptards listen to Dear Leader, Ruler of Earth 2.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now