The Libs on this site argue that Trump should have been fully prepared to produce and transport the Pfizer's vaccine. Of course, they must be thinking the same about the Moderna vaccine, right? Should Trump also have been fully prepared on another dozen vaccines? These same Libs would have complained and told us that it was a stupid move to have spent the money for those Pfizer preparations had the product not been approved.
Obviously, a fully-involved President would have monitored the progress of the trials closely, and as a result, would have had a pretty good idea of the likelihood of success and the logistics necessary to deliver the most likely candidate vaccines.
Does anyone think that in the last several months, Donald Trump monitored anything but his grievances and his golf game?
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
Obviously, a fully-involved President would have monitored the progress of the trials closely, and as a result, would have had a pretty good idea of the likelihood of success and the logistics necessary to deliver the most likely candidate vaccines.
Does anyone think that in the last several months, Donald Trump monitored anything but his grievances and his golf game?
If everyone knew that the Pfizer product would be approved, then why did the FDA take so long to study the data before voting? Why was the vote 17-4 and not unanimous? Why did Liberals demand that Trump not be involved in this approval process, yet the same Liberals demand that Trump know exacting what the FDA board was thinking?
You guys make zero sense.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
If everyone knew that the Pfizer product would be approved, then why did the FDA take so long to study the data before voting? Why was the vote 17-4 and not unanimous? Why did Liberals demand that Trump not be involved in this approval process, yet the same Liberals demand that Trump know exacting what the FDA board was thinking?
You guys make zero sense.
This seems like it would be too obvious to explain.
The President, any president, should not be involved in the approval process because it is a scientific, not a political decision.
The President SHOULD be informed about all progress so that he can use the mighty power of the federal government to facilitate the next step. I don't think the current resident did that.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
If everyone knew that the Pfizer product would be approved, then why did the FDA take so long to study the data before voting? Why was the vote 17-4 and not unanimous? Why did Liberals demand that Trump not be involved in this approval process, yet the same Liberals demand that Trump know exacting what the FDA board was thinking?
You guys make zero sense.
Why are you unable to spell "liberals"? Cognitive damage of some kind?
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
This seems like it would be too obvious to explain.
The President, any president, should not be involved in the approval process because it is a scientific, not a political decision.
The President SHOULD be informed about all progress so that he can use the mighty power of the federal government to facilitate the next step. I don't think the current resident did that.
Yeah, Boiler seems too dense to understand that Trump's role should have been not to approve the vaccine but rather, to be ready to immediately distribute whatever vaccine or vaccines became available.
What Boiler, with his Trump-crippled brain, fails to understand is that the shipping logistics could and should have been prepared without knowing which particular vaccine would be ready and when. The infrastructure to be used would be the same regardless of which vaccine was produced first.
But MP, you're trying to use logic. Boiler wants to defend Trump's treasonous incompetence no matter what, so he's logic-proof. I don't know why; Trump's never going to give him a lollipop.
Yet it was almost universally demanded by Liberals that Trump not be involved in the approval process.
No Liberal on this site have answered my questions about why the FDA took so long to approve the Pfizer product, and why the vote wasn't unanomous. No Liberal on this site has explained why Trump should have known what the FDA's vote outcome would be, even before those voting on the FDA committee had made their decison on how to vote.
This is hypocritical, illogical, and expected coming from you guys.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Yet it was almost universally demanded by Liberals that Trump not be involved in the approval process.
No Liberal on this site have answered my questions about why the FDA took so long to approve the Pfizer product, and why the vote wasn't unanomous. No Liberal on this site has explained why Trump should have known what the FDA's vote outcome would be, even before those voting on the FDA committee had made their decison on how to vote.
This is hypocritical, illogical, and expected coming from you guys.
NO presidents should be involved in an FDA approval process. ALL presidents should prepare the mighty federal government to anticipate actions to save American lives.
Sorry to have to re-state the obvious.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
NO presidents should be involved in an FDA approval process. ALL presidents should prepare the mighty federal government to anticipate actions to save American lives.
Sorry to have to re-state the obvious.
You think Boiler will understand if you say this to him a fourth time?
Sometimes, you have to give up on explaining to a whining toddler why he needs to behave. Sometimes, you have to just smack him. The brain deficit that prevents him from understanding what you're trying to say to him is probably related to why, after repeated instruction, he can't spell "liberals."
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
NO presidents should be involved in an FDA approval process. ALL presidents should prepare the mighty federal government to anticipate actions to save American lives.
Sorry to have to re-state the obvious.
It's pretty difficult to predict a coin flip, yet Mister expects it. You guys make me chuckle.
