ROE V WADE OVERTURNED

The Constitution mandates that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Those claiming this is a privacy issue are knowingly bastardizing the meaning of the Constitution  These same folks also tell us that fish is a bee.  Libs fully support Liberal judges legislating from the bench..............I do not.  This is a decision to be left to the states, and whatever they decide, that's the law.

Never trust a lyin' Lib.

Finally a real vagina entered this thread to give expert testimony.

Boiler, you should read the opinions from Roe v. Wade. The judges make a very good argument in favor of legalized abortion. Can you read? If not, maybe someone can read it to you.

Here's the concept you're ignorantly missing. The Constitutional clause you mention exists, but it does not mean that the states have the power to take away the people's rights. Those are the powers "prohibited by it to the States."

The part of the Constitution that the Court deemed applicable was the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Denying women the opportunity to have an abortion is a denial of their liberty without "due process," and therefore unconstitutional. Per the clause you yourself quoted, the states do not have the power to override the Fourteenth Amendment.

It's so obvious, Boiler. But you're a misogynistic, bigoted old fuck. Crawl back in your hole and die. Your time is over.

Boiler's hatred of women is almost as strong as his hatred of nonwhite people.

Boilerman, you cool with allowing states to outlaw interracial marriages? And making segregated buses, schools, and lunch counters legal? Because that would be allowed with your logic.

I don't expect you'll have the balls to answer.

Many laws enacted by the states have been nullified by the courts because those laws violate freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. The usual justification for these laws has taken two forms:

1. "Waaaal, the Constitution don't specifically say yew cain't shoot black people, so the states can decide whether that's lawful or it ain't."

2. The rights reserved to the states by the Constitution include the right to override or nullify the Constitution (a bizarre turn of "logic," but nevertheless, often employed).

The recent iteration of this has been the idiot bleat that the Constitution doesn't mention abortion. That's breathtakingly stupid--there are literally thousands of situations that the drafters of the Constitution could never have dreamed of. For instance, should social media be completely unregulated because it isn't mentioned in the Constitution? Do citizens have the right to own nuclear weapons because the Constitution doesn't say anything about them?

Boiler should educate himself. When the Constitution was drafted, a black person was officially only 3/5 of a human being. That concept was changed (now, Boiler thinks it's only 1/5). States can't say that black people aren't people.

As I've said many times, Liberals want Liberal judges to ignore the Constitution.  Thanks for proving my point.

I don't have a problem with individual states allowing abortion.  I have a problem with the Supreme court, or any court, overstepping it's mandate.  Libs say "Fuck the Constitution."
", as long as the vote moves their agenda.

I'm old at 63 years of age, but I'm not bigoted nor misogynistic.

No, I don't agree with any of those things.  Why, do you?

What Lewis and the rest of the morons who mouth off here do not comprehend is that abortion is not a "right".