What you didn't understand is that more people than you thought have the common sense to NOT blame the Democrats for inflation--it's a GLOBAL phenomenon and actually much worse elsewhere in the world than here. So while US government policies have a very small influence on that GLOBAL problem, if you want to think that they do, then the Democrats have been successful in controlling it to the extent that they can.
We don't have "massive" illegal immigration, and most people aren't as melodramatic about immigration as you are. 80% of the "illegals" in this country were admitted legally; they've simply overstayed their visas. That doesn't cause any real harm and in fact, if they're living productively and obeying the law, most people say, who cares? And immigrants, overall, commit fewer crimes than natives.
Fentanyl importation and deaths have been problems for over a decade--and they were during both Republican and Democrat administration. Therefore, sensible people don't blame the problem on either party.
High energy prices are due to events outside the US. So most people don't attribute them to the actions of either party.
"Ever increasing crime" has many causes, and it isn't as bad as you suggest. I know it's a standard Republican talking point.
"Disasterous" (learn to spell!) "socialistic" policies are the result of decades of bipartisan actions, which means those policies are the collective will of the people. Those include Social Security, Medicare, free education, libraries, etc. etc., which most people approve of and want.
Splitting power between the two parties is a pretty good outcome. I respect the decisions of the voters. As divided as the country is, that seems like a good compromise. And the Trump bloom is definitely off the rose. Trumpy candidates, at all levels, did very poorly. As did election deniers.
And maybe, just maybe, you can tone down your hate-filled rhetoric and accept that the voters have spoken. That would be much more grown-up than I expect from you, of course.
