I don't know if your discussion of "pipeline spills" is something that I should be greatly concerned with. How many spills were there exactly? How large was each spill? Is they're ongoing environmental concerns regarding these spills? What were damages at the time? How many spills and what size are spills each year? What is the alternative method of transportation of this crude and what environment and safety concerns are involved there.
Unless one is willing to consider these questions, and likely more questions, then one isn't interested in knowing the truth about oil pipelines. This oil is going to move somewhere by some method of transportation, and if one is truly interested in saving Mother Nature you might consider supporting the safest mode of transport.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
If Bundy's gun fondlers decide to give up on the freeloader, they can always go down to Texas. It turns out the Republicans down there are confiscating ranch land on behalf of FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Let freedom ring!
Yet another Forkush straw man. Land used for the Keystone XL Pipeline is a right-of-way easement. The landowner still owns and uses the land. The pipeline is buried and the land is restored to its original condition.
Keystone Landowners Guide
Well if you can't trust keystone-xl.com, who can you trust? What does bp.com have to say?
Keystone's first pipeline had a dozen spills in its first year, and it would be sending half a million barrels of crude every day under the creek which is the ranch's irrigation source. If history repeats itself, insurance won't cover it, and they'll have to sue Keystone.
Come on, you don't think that reduces the value of the property that Texas just claimed on behalf of a foreign corporation?
Having said that, if she threatens to kill our troops or our police in defiance of Texas law, she is a terrorists, just like the anti-BLM terrorists. And those who would defend either one are scum.
