I believe the NFL desires some stability in the league, and that includes the cities hosting NFL franchises. That being said, the league office will allow a move when a city offers a sweet deal. Most of those good deals appear to have dried up when the economy turned south, however.
Trump would dig up a deal since he's creative. I consider him to be a great businessman and a ruthless prick. He would be like Jerry Jones creating value and wealth, but he would not be the GM.
Quote
Originally posted by: ChilcootQuote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Jacksonville doesn't have a big enough population to support the team.
The NFL doesn't need its teams in big cities. Their stadiums are just TV studios. They could play the games anywhere.
2013: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2012: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2011: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2010: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2009: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2008: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2007: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
2007: Empty seats in Jacksonville. Team doesn't move to Los Angeles.
. . .
The Jaguars’ lease with the city expires in 2030 and it would cost about $100 million to break the lease. For the NFL and Shad Khan, $100 million is almost nothing. He has $4B, and didn't get it by being dumb.
Yet he and the league keep the Jaguars in Jacksonville (and the Bills in Buffalo and the Chargers in San Diego and the Packers in Green Bay and the Bucs in Tampa and the Raiders, well, hmmm).
NFL stadiums are TV studios and could be put anywhere.