Equality

From THe Federalist

So now we know why the Democrats are adopting economic inequality as their central issue: because their constituents, the people who live under policies crafted by the left, are the ones who experience the highest degree of income inequality in their own lives.


That’s the upshot of a recent study of income inequality organized by congressional district: “Across the country, inequality is lower in Republican districts than in Democratic ones” and is “highest in the New York City district of Representative Jerry Nadler, a liberal Democrat.” Who has the congressional district with the least income inequality? That would be Tea Party favorite Michele Bachmann, who represents suburban Minneapolis.

Not so in the Twin Cities themselves. Minneapolis-St. Paul, a Democratic stronghold, is notable for a particularly high level of inequality between blacks and whites. Another study from the National Urban League shows that economic inequality by race is concentrated in left-leaning cities, particularly in the North: “the San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City metropolitan area has an astonishing $56,000 white-black gap in household median income. The white-black gap in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington metro area is about $40,000.”
Liberals used to argue for equal opportunities for all, and I applaud this concept. How to achieve this concept has always been the point of contention between those on the Left and those on the Right.

Liberals now leap immediately over the "equal opportunity" push, and now demand equal pay for all.

If one works hard in school and gives a solid effort each day at work, one will make a fine living in America. Those with greater talents will make an exceptional living in America. Skip classes, flunk out at 16, and regularly miss work and you disserve what you get...........and that won't be much.

One is due what they are worth, and not a penny more.



Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
From THe Federalist

So now we know why the Democrats are adopting economic inequality as their central issue: because their constituents, the people who live under policies crafted by the left, are the ones who experience the highest degree of income inequality in their own lives.


That’s the upshot of a recent study of income inequality organized by congressional district: “Across the country, inequality is lower in Republican districts than in Democratic ones” and is “highest in the New York City district of Representative Jerry Nadler, a liberal Democrat.” Who has the congressional district with the least income inequality? That would be Tea Party favorite Michele Bachmann, who represents suburban Minneapolis.

Not so in the Twin Cities themselves. Minneapolis-St. Paul, a Democratic stronghold, is notable for a particularly high level of inequality between blacks and whites. Another study from the National Urban League shows that economic inequality by race is concentrated in left-leaning cities, particularly in the North: “the San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City metropolitan area has an astonishing $56,000 white-black gap in household median income. The white-black gap in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington metro area is about $40,000.”


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Liberals now leap immediately over the "equal opportunity" push, and now demand equal pay for all.



I cant even think of one liberal who has made that argument. Please enlighten me by providing a single name.

And who gets to decide what "one is worth"? The CEO's with their incomes at record multiples of their employees?
The democrats have brought up the equal pay for women, without any regard for women working for industries that pay less

This is new news?
I guess this means that correlation means causation!
Oh yea, didn't Obama just do a whole press conference about this subject with a side of min. wage raise?
1. Obama is arguing for "income equality", and making grand assumptions that all groups are equal in abilities and efforts. I work for a minority owned company, and at my company the "average" white employee runs circles around the "average" black employee. We have poor white employees and great black employees but the white group is far superior to the black group.

I suggest the poor efforts in the black community are an unfortunate unintended consequence after decades of government giveaways and quota systems. Mr. Black Average has a lower level of education, misses more work, and says "that's not my job" too often. I live it every day, and I'm certain that some of you do also.

2. The owner(s) of the company should decide how much money the CEO is worth and paid. This is no business of the government.

Now I ask, “Is stating the truth is racist?”



Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Liberals now leap immediately over the "equal opportunity" push, and now demand equal pay for all.



I cant even think of one liberal who has made that argument. Please enlighten me by providing a single name.

And who gets to decide what "one is worth"? The CEO's with their incomes at record multiples of their employees?


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
This is new news?
Nope. Very wealthy people want to live where there is great culture, great universities, great entertainment, great dining, and intelligent, diverse neighbors. And all of that wealth creates jobs for the lower classes.

Not too many rich people choose to spend their time in flyover country.



..dup post...
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now