I had a delightful conversation with a health Insurance company rep this morning

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Nope. The original estimate was 7 million for all of 2014"

So the govt took their page down

In September 2013, NBC News asked Sebelius what success would look like for Obamacare.“Well, I think success looks like at least seven million people having signed up by the end of March 2014


This is the first post you made on this page "It helps to use current numbers"
(which would be 6 million estimated enrolled from their most recent report.)

This is from your last post: "Nope. The original estimate was 7 million for all of 2014"

Let us know who wins the war between the corners of your mouth so we can figure out how to calculate revenue/costs.
Anyone who compares ten-year projections starting in 2010 with ten year projections starting in 2014 is deeply dishonest. Here's why.

In 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, Obamacare costs were minimal, so a 2010 ten-year projection only contains six years of significant costs.

The ten-year projection starting in 2014 has ten years of significant costs - 67% more.

Can you imagine being mendacious enough to try to compare the two? No wonder that right-wing rag needed to cover their tracks. hoops, have you EVER admitted you were wrong about anything, because now would be a good place to start.
Obamacare update: Went to refill three prescptions for myself only to be told one is not covered of course it was the most expensive one at $89.xx so my out of pocket costs just went up another $1080 per year lol.
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Obamacare update: Went to refill three prescptions for myself only to be told one is not covered of course it was the most expensive one at $89.xx so my out of pocket costs just went up another $1080 per year lol.
So now instead of Obamacare saving you $200,000 to $500,000 of your total bill, it's down to $198,980 to $498,980. Condolences.


Still you have a funny way of defining savings.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Anyone who compares ten-year projections starting in 2010 with ten year projections starting in 2014 is deeply dishonest. Here's why.

In 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, Obamacare costs were minimal, so a 2010 ten-year projection only contains six years of significant costs.

The ten-year projection starting in 2014 has ten years of significant costs - 67% more.

Can you imagine being mendacious enough to try to compare the two? No wonder that right-wing rag needed to cover their tracks. hoops, have you EVER admitted you were wrong about anything, because now would be a good place to start.


Actually obama & his cheerleader forky are the ones being dishonest.

1- obama used the initial 10 year projection showing that obamacare was affordable even though it included 10 years of revenue and only 6 years of expenses. The republicans pointed this discrepancy out years ago.
2- If Obama matched the revenue with the costs obamacare would have been defeated
3- Next lie - forky and obama used this revenue as a reason why the deficit was going down. Now that the costs are catching up to the revenue the deficit is going up.
4-forky calls me dishonest when I use a 10 year period that matches the revenue with costs. Forky is the one
being dishonest
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Still you have a funny way of defining savings.


Reaching
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
It seams to me that Liberals never consider a cost benifit analysis, but only the benifit.



Actually, liberals listened to the CBO which said the cost benefit is huge...and the CBO's revised analysis says its even hugerererer.

But our resident conservatives only consider the CBO credible when it serves their argument....otherwise they leave it to the experts at Breitbart.com


Strange, all this at a time when the baby boomers are retiring and will start drawing on the health care system in a big way. How many of "us" vs those in the "invicible" range are there?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now