I haven’t paid my Obamacare premium in months

IRS collectors come looking for you?
Pjstroh, you're such a moron. You're holy grail of "nobody saw it" TV, MSNBC, reported yesterday that exactly ZERO people signed up for and or paid the first months premium on the wonderful liberal Oregon site, and in Nevada, where at least 180,000 sign-ups were hoped for before the exchange's Director quit because of failure, as of May 3rd there were 35,000 signups, most of which are Medicaid losers.

Great healthcare law.
Quote

Originally posted by: albeadle33
...MSNBC, reported yesterday that exactly ZERO people signed up for and or paid the first months premium on the wonderful liberal Oregon site...
Karl Rove called to say that the "Obamacare Disaster!" attack is no longer useful, and he would appreciate it if you would switch to..."Benghazi!!" Also acceptable: "Hillary is old!"

Thank you for your cooperation.

It looks like to keep low premium increases, obama will be subsidizing the insurance compnaies

The Obama administration has quietly adjusted key provisions of its signature healthcare law to potentially make billions of additional taxpayer dollars available to the insurance industry if companies providing coverage through the Affordable Care Act lose money..

The move was buried in hundreds of pages of new regulations issued late last week. It comes as part of an intensive administration effort to hold down premium increases for next year, a top priority for the White House as the rates will be announced ahead of this fall's congressional elections.

Administration officials for months have denied charges by opponents that they plan a "bailout" for insurance companies providing coverage under the healthcare law.

They continue to argue that most insurers shouldn't need to substantially increase premiums because safeguards in the healthcare law will protect them over the next several years.

But the change in regulations essentially provides insurers with another backup: If they keep rate increases modest over the next couple of years but lose money, the administration will tap federal funds as needed to cover shortfalls.

Most Liberals have zero concern over the costs.


Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
It looks like to keep low premium increases, obama will be subsidizing the insurance compnaies

The Obama administration has quietly adjusted key provisions of its signature healthcare law to potentially make billions of additional taxpayer dollars available to the insurance industry if companies providing coverage through the Affordable Care Act lose money..

The move was buried in hundreds of pages of new regulations issued late last week. It comes as part of an intensive administration effort to hold down premium increases for next year, a top priority for the White House as the rates will be announced ahead of this fall's congressional elections.

Administration officials for months have denied charges by opponents that they plan a "bailout" for insurance companies providing coverage under the healthcare law.

They continue to argue that most insurers shouldn't need to substantially increase premiums because safeguards in the healthcare law will protect them over the next several years.

But the change in regulations essentially provides insurers with another backup: If they keep rate increases modest over the next couple of years but lose money, the administration will tap federal funds as needed to cover shortfalls.


Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
It looks like to keep low premium increases, obama will be subsidizing the insurance compnaies

The Obama administration has quietly adjusted key provisions of its signature healthcare law to potentially make billions of additional taxpayer dollars available to the insurance industry if companies providing coverage through the Affordable Care Act lose money..

The move was buried in hundreds of pages of new regulations issued late last week. It comes as part of an intensive administration effort to hold down premium increases for next year, a top priority for the White House as the rates will be announced ahead of this fall's congressional elections.

Administration officials for months have denied charges by opponents that they plan a "bailout" for insurance companies providing coverage under the healthcare law.

They continue to argue that most insurers shouldn't need to substantially increase premiums because safeguards in the healthcare law will protect them over the next several years.

But the change in regulations essentially provides insurers with another backup: If they keep rate increases modest over the next couple of years but lose money, the administration will tap federal funds as needed to cover shortfalls.


Words straight out of AP, NY Times, and our state newspaper. They do point out the flaw in the whole ACA proposition: it will cost the working taxpayer big time, and will draw funds away from programs that provide vital services to the poor other than sick health care.
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
...They do point out the flaw in the whole ACA proposition: it will cost the working taxpayer big time, and will draw funds away from programs that provide vital services to the poor other than sick health care.
You sure about that?



Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
...They do point out the flaw in the whole ACA proposition: it will cost the working taxpayer big time, and will draw funds away from programs that provide vital services to the poor other than sick health care.
You sure about that?





As sure as anyone can be at this point. How many initiatives have come in with a "projected" cost that didn't exceed it (by far) in the long run? "The administration will tap federal funds as needed." Somebody will get hurt.
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
...They do point out the flaw in the whole ACA proposition: it will cost the working taxpayer big time, and will draw funds away from programs that provide vital services to the poor other than sick health care.
You sure about that?





As sure as anyone can be at this point. How many initiatives have come in with a "projected" cost that didn't exceed it (by far) in the long run? "The administration will tap federal funds as needed." Somebody will get hurt.
You sure about that?




Thanks, I've already stated my opinion, no need to keep at it. Over and out.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now