Vegas Free-for-All - New threats?

New threats?

forkushV

Aug 5, 2013
6:56am

Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...

You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

Roulette Man

Aug 5, 2013
7:12am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs. Damn you are the biggest political whore I think I've ever met. You would wish for harm to this country if it meant you could get ahead in your politics. Sad, really sad.

forkushV

Aug 5, 2013
7:21am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...
You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs...

Tora Bora? Nope, that was Bush also.

Roulette Man

Aug 5, 2013
7:37am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...
You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs...

Tora Bora? Nope, that was Bush also.

So do you want to take a bet that Clinton had the chance to take Bin Laden out? Or are we going to only get more lies and propaganda from you?

forkushV

Aug 5, 2013
8:02am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...
You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs...
Tora Bora? Nope, that was Bush also.

So do you want to take a bet that Clinton had the chance to take Bin Laden out? Or are we going to only get more lies and propaganda from you?

Oh, you mean before he had harmed any American citizens. Before we had any legal basis for doing so - except the "Whatever America Does is Totally Bitchin' Doctrine?" No, I don't thing so. And factcheck.org agrees with me. You got a Sudanese war criminal taking your side though, so there's that.

Now let's argue over "Could Herbert Hoover have taken out Adolf Hitler in 1930?"

Roulette Man

Aug 5, 2013
8:11am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...
You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs...
Tora Bora? Nope, that was Bush also.

So do you want to take a bet that Clinton had the chance to take Bin Laden out? Or are we going to only get more lies and propaganda from you?

More diversion and lies from the political whore. There are only about 500 stories on this. Let's get them from links to ones that are not considered right wing.

Hank Crumpton, Former CIA Officer: Clinton Wouldn't Authorize Osama Bin Laden Kill In 1999

Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities

Dan Svatass

Aug 5, 2013
8:30am

Block User

As forkushV notes, Factcheck.org (a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center founded by President Reagan's buddy Walter Annenberg) answered this question definitively a couple years ago:

Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?

A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens.

Link

In 1996, Osama Bin Laden was only known as a financier of terrorism. In other words, he had the same status as Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who financed terrorists in Northern Ireland called the Irish Republican Army.

I'm sure Roulette Man doesn't similarly mean to condemn President Clinton for failing to take out terrorist financier Peter King (R-NY). In fact, the whole notion is silly!

forkushV

Aug 5, 2013
8:31am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You what's amazing, if we had an attack at this time, Forkush and Chilcoot would have been the first to criticize Bush for not doing enough and would have said that the warning was out...
You mean like the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" Presidential Daily Brief from the CIA that occurred 35 days before 9/11? Yeah, I think criticism was deserved.

I guess other folks just though Bush deserved a Mulligan on that one.

What about the time that Clinton didn't take Bin Laden out when he was in the crosshairs...
Tora Bora? Nope, that was Bush also.

So do you want to take a bet that Clinton had the chance to take Bin Laden out? Or are we going to only get more lies and propaganda from you?
Oh, you mean before he had harmed any American citizens. Before we had any legal basis for doing so - except the "Whatever America Does is Totally Bitchin' Doctrine?" No, I don't thing so. And factcheck.org agrees with me. You got a Sudanese war criminal taking your side though, so there's that.

Now let's argue over "Could Herbert Hoover have taken out Adolf Hitler in 1930?"

If you believe that particular Sudanese war criminal, then yes, Clinton could have tried to capture bin Laden. (And had no legal right to imprison him.) And Hoover could have killed Hitler in 1930. And Harry Truman could have had George H.W. Bush and Barbara sterilized.

Yes, the world would be a better place. If only they could see into the future!

Dan Svatass

Aug 5, 2013
8:34am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
If only they could see into the future!

Shame that Roulette Man doesn't understand that Minority Report was fiction.

Roulette Man

Aug 5, 2013
8:37am

Block User

Hmmm. The political whore can't answer for specifics that I stated. When I go to Fact Check they don't mention the 1999 incident and use the term "probably not" regarding earlier incidendents.

The political whore has not made his case nor has he refuted what was reported by NBC News and the Huffington Post. He has only given us pictures and diversions.

This should almost be illegal at how easy it is to take him on.

‹2 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now