Plaza to charge RESORT FEE

Quote

Originally posted by: drmilled
lurkerposter- Dr. Idiot here, and I would like to ask- if you only stay at locations that comp your rooms (and their "resort fee"), why would you not use all of the wonderful "resort fee" included nonsense? Could it be that you realize that the "included nonsense" has no real value? The only possible included item with any value would be wi-fi, which can be found almost everywhere in Vegas for free. I don't imagine that many Vegas visitors go to Vegas to spend hours a day sitting in their rooms using their computer. The real rip off part of the "resort fees" is that visitors are having to pay extra, per day, for things that they never use or want. If you want to compare room prices with and without "resort fees", go ahead. The bottom line is that even if you choose the cheaper room price that has a "resort fee" you are still paying more for that room than you would pay if that room did not have the "resort fee". But it is your money, spend it ant way you want.


Because I simply don't feel like using it. The only thing I use is the towel service at the pool. Because that's where part of my vacation is spent. I choose not to use the internet during my vacation. I choose not to make all kinds of phone calls or send or receive faxes. I'M ON VACATION. If people want to use those things, more power to them. I don't, I also don't worry about something as futile as a resort fee when I know my stay is going to be comped and I'm going to spend way more on gambling than on "paying a resort feee". Compare Vegas room rates to other cities in the world and you'll see very quickly that the amount of luxury you get in Vegas exceeds the vast majority of hotel rooms in other parts of the world considering the price you're paying. As soon as I have to worry about a resort fee, I'll travel to another destination. You go ahead and continue your crusade against resort fees, which in the end will change absolutely nothing.....

Quote

Originally posted by: drmilled
lurkerposter- Dr. Idiot here, ... The bottom line is that even if you choose the cheaper room price that has a "resort fee" you are still paying more for that room than you would pay if that room did not have the "resort fee". But it is your money, spend it ant way you want.


Patently false. The rates would be $20 or $25 higher if these hotels eliminate the gimmicky lower price structure with the additional resort fee.

Of all the Hotels that charge a resort fee, I like the way two do it...

1. TI--Their Resort Fee is Optional.
2. Stratosphere--They only charge $7.50 a day and that covers unlimited admission to the tower which is normally $18.00 for adults and $10.00 for children. It's well worth it.
friedmush- my point exactly- the rates would be higher, but the higher rates would be posted and known when making a reservation. lurkerposter- you can compare Vegas room rates to anywhere else if you want to. I am talking about Vegas and nowhere else. alanleroy- I agree with you about the optional Resort Fee offered @ the TI. This is the way resort fees should be handled- they should be optional.

Quote

Originally posted by: drmilled
friedmush- my point exactly- the rates would be higher, but the higher rates would be posted and known when making a reservation l.


That's your point exactly? Really??... You argued just the opposite above when you posted, "The bottom line is that even if you choose the cheaper room price that has a "resort fee" you are still paying more for that room than you would pay if that room did not have a "resort fee." But it is your money, spend it any way you want."



Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
... I like ...
2. Stratosphere--They only charge $7.50 a day and that covers unlimited admission to the tower which is normally $18.00 for adults and $10.00 for children. It's well worth it.
Actually, this may be the worst possible example of a resort fee. The owners can easily segregate those who use the tower from those who don't. Therefore, there is no reason to add it to the room price.

Quote

Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
... I like ...
2. Stratosphere--They only charge $7.50 a day and that covers unlimited admission to the tower which is normally $18.00 for adults and $10.00 for children. It's well worth it.
Actually, this may be the worst possible example of a resort fee. The owners can easily segregate those who use the tower from those who don't. Therefore, there is no reason to add it to the room price.


Most of these charges can be easily segregated...like Internet Access, Newspapers, Bottled Water, Local Calls....What's your point? Regardless of whether or not the owners can segregate the fee it's a good value at the strat because most people who stay at the Strat want to visit the tower. The resort fee of $7.50 saves a family of 4 $48. Show me a better return on a resort fee. It's the ONLY one that I would gladly pay if staying at the Strat because it would save ME money....and my comment was that I like the way they do it....low fee, big value.

I apparently am having trouble breaking this down to the lowest common denominator. friedmush- what part of -if you choose the cheaper room that has a resort fee, you are still paying more for that room then if that room did not have a resort fee do you not understand? My statement about rates being higher if posted and would be known when making a reservation has nothing to do with my statement concerning the price of a room that has no resort fee.
To sum up:

1. No one likes resort fees.

2. Some people approach the resort fee issue rationally by including them among the factors to be considered in deciding where to stay.

3. Other people become so enraged by resort fees that they, as a matter of principle, refuse to stay at a hotel that imposes them, even if doing so deprives them of a great deal at a place they'd otherwise love to stay.

4. At least one such person has so little self-control that he simply cannot resist tossing insults when confronted by a person who doesn't share that view.
Chilcoot - to sum up; 1) it is all about the money and the perceived value of what you receive for your money., 2) I notice that you prefer to keep stirring the pot when ever your view point is contradicted., 3). I have refrained from "tossing insults" since I realize that many would seize upon the perceive insult as a excuse to get off of the original topic as they mount their high horse., 4) have a nice day.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now