Plaza to charge RESORT FEE

Quote

Originally posted by: drmilled
Since all rental car agencies are under the same tax umbrella (in Vegas), I do rent cars knowing that if I want to use a rental car I have no other option but pay the taxes and fees associated with a car rental.
That's not true at all.

There is more than one tax umbrella for rental cars in Vegas. A person who picks up a car at the airport pays both an Airport Concession Fee and a Rental Car Facility Fee. Both can be avoided by renting off-airport. As with resort fees, the visitor has a choice.

I think agnes has exposed another inconsistency in drmilled's approach to Vegas add-on fees.
Hey Doc, how do you like that hole you're digging for yourself. Ain't it deep enough yet???
Quote

Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy
Most of these charges can be easily segregated...like Internet Access, Newspapers, Bottled Water, Local Calls....What's your point? Regardless of whether or not the owners can segregate the fee it's a good value at the strat because most people who stay at the Strat want to visit the tower. The resort fee of $7.50 saves a family of 4 $48. Show me a better return on a resort fee. It's the ONLY one that I would gladly pay if staying at the Strat because it would save ME money....and my comment was that I like the way they do it....low fee, big value.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99 +1, well said Alan
No, NOT WELL SAID. Do you know how EFFIN HARD it is to get newspapers to all the right rooms, AND JUST THE RIGHT ROOMS, every day????? To make sure that some rooms have bottled water, and SOME DON'T???? To make sure some phones have local access and SOME DON'T, and to do that RIGHT every EFFIN DAY??? DO YOU HAVE ANY CONCEPT OF REALITY???

Or do you just like making false statements and then claiming the other person has no point? The Strat can EASILY provide discounted access to the tower for its guests. There is no reason to charge a guest for tower access if that guest doesn't want it, because it's EASY to monitor access to the tower.


You're just arguing arguing for arguments sake now or your really thick,actually I think a bit of both. He was singling out the strat, NOT talking about parceling out daily newspapers at MGM grand, SHEESH!
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99 You're just arguing arguing for arguments sake now or your really thick,actually I think a bit of both. He was singling out the strat, NOT talking about parceling out daily newspapers at MGM grand, SHEESH!
Um, he clearly said newspapers could be easily segregated. Now you say he wasn't talking about newspapers. And you say that I'm arguing for arguments sake.

My point was quite, quite simple, i.e. the customer should be allowed a choice when allowing the choice is easy. Neither of you choose to acknowledge a simple point, rather you call me thick.


That's right. Marcus and I have our own definitions of "Good" and "Bad" resort fees. He classes as bad any fees that he thinks can be 'easily' separated out. I classify as 'Good' any fee that adds great value for most guests. For example, I never buy a newspaper when I'm on vacation, so adding a paper and calling it a Resort fee doesn't add value for me. That's bad for me since I'm stuck paying for it, but toss it in the trash, but apparantely good for Marcus...since he thinks it's really hard to determine who wants to opt in for a paper and who doesn't. Here's a hint...instead of throwing it into a resort fee, put it in Newspaper machine and let those that want one buy one....Separated out with no fuss whatsoever.

Whether or not it's easy to turn on or off is actually irrelevant...Gauge the fees by what it adds to your vacation vs what it costs. In the case of the Strat it adds a great deal for most consumers.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroy Here's a hint...instead of throwing it into a resort fee, put it in Newspaper machine and let those that want one buy one....Separated out with no fuss whatsoever.

Whether or not it's easy to turn on or off is actually irrelevant...Gauge the fees by what it adds to your vacation vs what it costs. In the case of the Strat it adds a great deal for most consumers.
Newspaper machines are expensive, inconvenient, difficult to maintain, difficult to police, and difficult to keep stocked appropriately. Rather than calling me thick, denying reality, and continuously reiterating YOUR PERSONAL perceptions about the value of tower access, you might just open your mind, just a bit.

It is DIFFICULT for a hotel to get the exact newspaper to the exact customer, and do that with an appropriate service quality. It ISN'T difficult to let people into the Strat tower IF THEY CHOOSE to go in. How can you possibly have such a hard time with that?



Geez. And, I thought Keeping up with the Kardashians was easy.
Seriously though, if one sees value in a package that includes a resort fee, so be it. It's THEIR vacation, THEIR money and CHOICE of how to spend it.
Quote

Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA

and continuously reiterating YOUR PERSONAL perceptions about the value of tower access...

Ah...but we know the exact value of Tower Access. $18.00 for Adults, $10.00 for children. This is not a 'PERSONAL perception'...it is a real cost that most guests would be paying if they stayed at the Strat and this was not part of the Resort Fee.

Quote

Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
It is DIFFICULT for a hotel to get the exact newspaper to the exact customer, and do that with an appropriate service quality. It ISN'T difficult to let people into the Strat tower IF THEY CHOOSE to go in. How can you possibly have such a hard time with that?

Oh I understand it perfectly...I just consider it irrelevant to anything in the 'Real World'....like a decision to Stay at the Strat or anywhere else for that matter. It only serves to illustrate your personal made up way to rate good and bad resort fees.

My personal made up way to rate good and bad resort fees is based on how much the fee is vs how much it saves me (and most consumers). It has nothing to do with how difficult it would be to separate them out...they are what they are and we make decisions based on reality, not based on how we think the hotels should be run....at least those of us living in the real world do.

My contention has been that most people who stay at the Strat will visit the Tower regardless of whether it is included in the resort fee or not. Therefore it is a great value Specific to the Strat for most consumers. Who really cares if they 'could' separate it out? Only the very small % who stay at the Strat and don't visit the Tower...OR those who pass on the strat because they don't want to visit the tower and the $7.50 makes the difference in their decision. Well for their $7.50 they can enjoy their telephone at the strat or somewhere else....oh and maybe the armchair Casino execs who base their Good and Bad fees on a different calculation...I'm sure in their Fantasy world, their Casinos are very successful.
You people need to lighten up on Drmilled. I find him rather charming. I have always been turned on by boorish imps (I use the term affectionately) in a bad girl kind of way.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now