Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLAIt was LurkerPoster who said "I think the only thing he was trying to do is generate traffic to his own forum so he could earn some money from the advertising on his forum. Cheap move IMHO."
And Road Trip chimed in with "However, you did neglect to mention that much of your sites advertising is through the Google Ad-Sense program, for which you (or perhaps your "webmaster") IS receiving some revenue."
Road Trip goes on to say "I just pointed out that your sites advertising is Googles ad sense program, and they pay nicely."
Of course these comments had nothing to do with my original posting but were conveniently mentioned for what purpose? Care to comment LurkerPoster or Road Trip?
You can bet that I care to comment. !
When you "mis-spoke", I provided correct and accurate information regarding the mis-information being provided by you.
It was you who stated that I said something I did not say. I corrected you. You said so yourself at the beginning of this message. Than you proceed to question my purpose in revealing some of what the Google Ad-Sense program is.
It was you who claimed "no revenue" from your sites advertising. I merely pointed out that Google Ad-Sense provides the advertising, and that someone is receiving compensation.
Quote
For the record, there are more than 300 pages on my various websites that I own and control -- not including the Forum in question. Does Google pay well? I couldn't push the button on a $5 aces and faces machine five times a week ($25 X 5 = $125) for what Google pays.
C'mon..... in a previous message you stated you do not receive any compensation for your sites advertising, yet you know how much is coming in?
Quote
I know you guys don't like me. Is it because I wanted to give Rob Singer a fair hearing? Or is it beause I don't like people who try to rip off the casinos with cheap scams that are only a step above stealing soap off the maid's cart?
No, it is because you enter discussions like an infomercial, pretending to provide accurate information and research, when the reality is that you have a different agenda, and care little whether you are providing all of the information people want or need to make an informed and superior choice.
You make too many errors of omissions. Ignore responses that may be difficult to answer honestly and factually. And constantly contradict yourself. Constantly.
You stated in this thread:
Quote
No, the reason why I removed them is that the usual suspects tried to pollute the discussion with references to Rob Singer. And I won't be part of that.
Than you went home and on your own forum, said:
Quote
I removed my comments from there because the usual suspects already started to attack me, and yes there was a mention of Rob. I could see where the "discussion" there was going.
