Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
But it appears that, . . .Don Diego, . . . [has] already pivoted to a new attack position.
DonDiego cannot speak for others.
But in DonDiego's case, pjstroh is mistaken.
DonDiego has steadfastly opposed the Affordable Care Act [ACA].
DonDiego has always favored permitting anyone with health insurance to retain the plan they prefer. [One intent of the ACA was to eliminate any plans which do not meet all the specifications of Obamacare; in spite of the “grandfather issue” the administration knew millions of policies would be cancelled even if people wanted to keep them. This has been documented repeatedly within this thread.]
DonDiego always supports adherence to The Constitution of the United States. [If one wishes to pass legislation or otherwise act in violation of the Constitution, DonDiego would prefer adherence to the provisions to amend the Constitution. These provisions to change the Constitution are intentionally difficult; that is a primary reason they are preferred over just using "Executive Authority" or "Congressional Authority" to ignore it.]
DonDiego has always supported the Rule of Law, . . . not the Rule of Men. [Until or unless the ACA is voided or declared illegal by the courts, this applies even to Obamacare.]
DonDiego suggests the President’s executive discretionary powers do not permit him to permit direct violations of the law.
As of 1 January 2014 The Affordable Care Act expressly forbids insurance companies to sell the plans which do not meet the ACA specifications, . . . unless the plan was grandfathered and NO changes were made to the plan since the passage of the ACA. President Obama now says HE will "permit" them to be sold in violation of the ACA as passed by Congress and signed by the President.
DonDiego suggests the President’s executive powers do no permit him to simple declare provisions of the law invalid on a whim.
Others have already taken notice:
"So I personally believe, even if it takes a change to the law, the president should honor the commitment the federal government made to those people and let them keep what they got."
__President William Clinton, 12 November 2013
“I wonder if he has the legal authority to do this, since this was a congressional bill that set this up”
__ Howard Dean, 14 November 2013
“We have our own proposal, which we think is really good. I think that we’ll see in the next 24, 48, 36 hours something to the effect of how do we accommodate those people [who have faced cancellation of their health plans]”
__Representative Nancy Pelosi, 14 November 2013
DonDiego’s opinion, . . . just another tactic to keep the farce that is Obamacare going as long as the Administration can.
And find someone else to blame.
Say President Obama does permit the Insurance Companies to keep the illegal policies in force, . . . and, say, the insurance companies decide not to do so, perhaps because it is not in their interest.
All of a sudden: “IT’S THE INSURANCE COMPANIES’ FAULT ! ! !”
Say the Congressional Democrats do introduce “amendments” to cover the President’s ass permitting policies illegal as of 1 January 2014 to be legal once again.
And, say, the Republicans do not go along.
All of a sudden: “IT’S THE REPUBLICANS’ FAULT ! ! !”
DonDiego says: "No. It has been, . . . it is now, . . . and it always will be the fault of Obamacare."
If the Congress and Courts allow the President to unilaterally violate a Law without opposition, . . . even if the Law's provisions are stupid or punitive or simply wrong, . . . where will they draw the line.