Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
1. With no insurance: When they ask you how you are going to pay, you have a case of the giggles - like you did with your wife's situation - and tell them they will be stiffed.
2. With Obamacare: You tell them you are broke, but that insurance will come up with about $94,000, and you will make arrangements to pay the rest.
Under which scenario do you think that the hospital will provide better treatment? Silly me, but I think that hospitals and other providers respond to financial incentives and disincentives. And no insurance sounds like a way to get substandard care, and is a stupid bet.
Originally posted by: forkushV
QuoteLet's take a similar situation to what your wife experienced. Let's say the hospital checks you out, and it's looking like $100,000 for the procedure and treatment.
Originally posted by: malibber2
What good is insurance if you can't afford to use it?
1. With no insurance: When they ask you how you are going to pay, you have a case of the giggles - like you did with your wife's situation - and tell them they will be stiffed.
2. With Obamacare: You tell them you are broke, but that insurance will come up with about $94,000, and you will make arrangements to pay the rest.
Under which scenario do you think that the hospital will provide better treatment? Silly me, but I think that hospitals and other providers respond to financial incentives and disincentives. And no insurance sounds like a way to get substandard care, and is a stupid bet.
So....hospitals and doctors will base the quality of care delivered on the amount of coverage a patient has.
