Things That Make One Go "Hmm"

Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: Tutontow
As a legal gun owner and somebody who has been glad more than once I had them in my home let me offer my two cents. The original newspaper article was nothing more than an attempt to vilify and harass legal gun owners.

I am a hardcore union man, liberal democrat who still believes in individual liberty. We need to quit taking away other peoples liberty and we need to quit giving up our liberty because others are not able to handle it.

We need to make people accountable for their actions and quit trying to whittle away our liberty because of those that abuse the freedoms we have in this country.


Sorry Tutontow, but you are not a liberal. You may think you are, or wish you were because of the alternate title but alas, you are not.
Welcome to the dark side.................it'll be OK, we have cookies!


I prefer to think of myself free thinker. I believe that is the problem with politics today, God forbid if you agree with somebody from the other side you will be labeled a traitor a rino and God knows what else.

The other thing that gets me is how many people can't have a differing viewpoint without getting mean spirited and close minded.

One of the best things to happen to Florida was Bob Graham as governor. He said it best. when I was in Washington the game was played between the forty yard lines now it is played on the ten yard lines.

So all in all you may be right maybe I am a left leaning independent who thinks everyone has good ideas and bad ideas. Most of us love the country we just have different ideas about what path to take.


Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The current Biden-Discusion group has my sympathies.
Well, at least the leader of the Biden-Discussion Group has revealed a possible solution:

" 'The president is going to act. Executive orders, executive action, can be taken,' Biden told reporters before meetings with groups representing survivors of mass shootings. 'We haven't decided what this is yet, but we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and all the rest of the Cabinet members.' "
Ref: CNN

"So let it be written, . . . so let it be done."___Rameses, The Ten Commandents, 1956, Cecil B. DeMille


Things that make you go Hmmmm.....

I did not know the President of the United States could fundamentally diminish rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights by Executive Order.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
And Don Diego has revealed his unconditional opposittion to whatever that discussion group comes up with - before even knowing what it is.
No, . . . DonDiego has passed no judgement whatsoever on the possible proposals from the Biden Discussion Group.
All DonDiego did was quote the Leader of the Discussion Group indicating that the President is likely to employ unspecified Executive Orders.

This revelation leads immediately to jphelan's following apparent incredulity on the matter:
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
I did not know the President of the United States could fundamentally diminish rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights by Executive Order.
DonDiego also does not know this. In fact, he thinks it is not so. But what DonDiego thinks is not what matters.

Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
...I did not know the President of the United States could fundamentally diminish rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights...
Oh the things you don't know!

Fundamental rights have limitations put on them every day. For example, the government can limit speech if it takes the form of yelling fire in a crowded theater, kiddie porn, advocating the violent overthrow of the government, libel; slander, copyright violation, publishing military secrets, and so on.

Anyone who claims that ANY right is absolute is either ignorant or dishonest. Perhaps both.

Quote

Originally posted by: arshaleign
Fundamental rights have limitations put on them every day. For example, the government can limit speech if it takes the form of yelling fire in a crowded theater, kiddie porn, advocating the violent overthrow of the government, libel; slander, copyright violation, publishing military secrets, and so on.
The issue is not that rights can be limited.
Endangerment of the citizenry trumps one's right to yell "fire" in a theater, . . . unless there is a fire. And the right to sell a work of art can be overridden by previous ownership as a copyright violation.
And the Biden Discussion Group may determine a way to solve the current problem. DonDiego hopes the group defines the problem clearly, before they derive a solution limiting citizens' rights injudiciously.

But the specific issue here is can rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights be limited by an Executive Order.

I seem to recall an unpopular recent President asserting a unilateral right to electronically monitor American citizens within this country without a warrant despite words in the Fourth Amendment.

And imprison them outside this country, never to be brought to trial, despite words in the Fifth Amendment.

And torture them on foreign soil despite words in the Eighth Amendment.

Popular President Obama has not yet proposed to do anything about firearms by executive order. Early indications are that he is considering merely limproving the existing, Congressionally-approved databases used to perform background checks, and press the Senate to confirm his choice for ATF Director, which has been vacant for six years. Oooh, scary!

Hardly the sort of attack on the Bill of Rights we saw that unpopular recent President take.

But more than enough to cause President Obama's dwindling number of detractors to fly off in their usual ignorant rage.

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
...But the specific issue here is can rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights be limited by an Executive Order.
President Reagan issued an executive order voiding the rights of litigants to due process in US federal court, and then handed final jurisdiction over to an international court. The president was sued. The Supreme Court upheld the executive order.

I think that settles it.

I guess the President could also declare Marshall Law......I don't think that would work out so well though.

Arse...do you have more details on the Reagan "limitation" you quote so I can research?
There seems to be quite a bit of bellyaching about the President's ability to issue executive orders.
Don Diego frames it as being performed by people with a God complex. The Drudge Report today compared it to Hitler and Stalin. They had cute little pictures too to assist their readers who might not iknow who those people are. That was certainly enough to make this gentle contributor say, "hmmm"

I can find plenty of examples of executive orders I dont like. I can do the same with Congressionally passed legislation. But I dont have a standing objection to the process by which either is performed in our system.

Of course, for anyone who does I invite them to sound off on each of the several hundred such orders issued by our last president. I'll even give them a helpful boost by providing the list here. Enjoy

Bush's long list of Stalinist, Nazi executive orders.
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan


I did not know the President of the United States could fundamentally diminish rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights by Executive Order.


I didn't know that either. Further, I dont know of a case where this president has.

Do you have an example or are you referencing a hypothetical executive order you fabricated for the purposes of beating up a strawman?
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now